Home | Newsupdate |Election 2008 | Poll Number |Gallery | Blog | Signup | Support | Contact


Saturday, June 30, 2007

Democrats woo Hispanics with immigration reform

LAKE BUENA VISTA, Florida (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidates wooed Hispanic voters on Saturday with pledges to keep working for immigration laws that would allow more of those already in the United States to become citizens and voters.

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and five other Democrats spoke to the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials two days after the U.S. Senate killed a proposal that would have created a path to citizenship for more than 12 million illegal immigrants, many of them Hispanic.

The association had supported the proposal and the candidates said they would keep working for a better version that weighed the contributions of immigrants as heavily as the need for border security.

Clinton, the New York senator who leads the Democratic field in national polls for the November 2008 election, said the United States must find a way to tighten border security while giving undocumented workers a sensible way to become legal workers even if they lack the high-tech skills favored for visa applications.

"Many of us had relatives who came to this country without skills but have made a great contribution to themselves and their families and we're proud of them and we want to give more people that chance going forward," Clinton said.

All four Democratic candidates in the Senate -- Clinton, Obama, Dodd and Joe Biden of Delaware -- voted to advance the now-failed immigration proposal.

A recent USA TODAY/Gallup Poll said U.S. Hispanics, by nearly 3 to 1, are Democrats or lean that way. Two-thirds of U.S. Hispanics live in states that will hold primary elections to choose presidential nominees on or before February 5, 2008, including Florida, California, New York and Texas. In previous elections, the early primaries that weed out the field of candidates were concentrated in states with only small Latino populations.


By Jane Sutton, Reuters, June 30, 2007

Clinton slams GOP rival's Cuba remark

LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. - Taking a swipe at a potential GOP presidential rival, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday criticized Fred Thompson for suggesting illegal Cuban immigrants pose a terrorist threat.

"I was appalled when one of the people running for or about to run for the Republican nomination talked about Cuban refugees as potential terrorists," Clinton told Hispanic elected officials. "Apparently he doesn't have a lot of experience in Florida or anywhere else, and doesn't know a lot of Cuban-Americans."

Thompson, who is polling strongly among GOP primary voters and is expected to join the race soon, made the comment at a campaign stop Wednesday in South Carolina. The actor and former Tennessee senator was criticizing an immigration bill in the Senate, contending it would make the country more vulnerable to terrorism. Noting that the United States had apprehended 1,000 people from Cuba in 2005, Thompson said, "I don't imagine they're coming here to bring greetings from Castro. We're living in the era of the suitcase bomb." Fidel Castro is Cuba's leader.

All the major Democratic presidential candidates were at Walt Disney World for a forum sponsored by the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials. Of the GOP candidates, only California Rep. Duncan Hunter accepted the group's invitation to speak.

With the failure of an immigration reform bill in the Senate still fresh, all the candidates vowed to pursue comprehensive immigration reform in the future. All said they support a path to citizenship for the 12 million immigrants living illegally in the U.S.

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama defended his vote last year to build a 700-mile fence across the U.S.-Mexican border, saying it was just one component of a robust immigration bill he had worked hard to negotiate. "Nobody has been a more consistent supporter of comprehensive immigration reform than I have been," Obama said. "Do I believe fences make good neighbors and are the right approach? No, I don't believe that." Clinton and Delaware Sen. Joe Biden also voted for the bill containing the fence provision.

Florida, which intends to hold its important primary Jan. 29, is more than 20 percent Hispanic.


By Beth Fouhy, Associated Press, June 30, 2007
Friday, June 29, 2007

Rodham Clinton Leads McCain, Thompson in U.S.

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton is the top-rated presidential contender in the United States, according to a poll by Opinion Research Corporation released by CNN. At least 49 per cent of respondents would support the New York senator in head-to-head contests against three prospective Republican nominees.

Rodham Clinton holds a four-point lead over actor and former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson, a two-point advantage over Arizona senator John McCain, and a one-point edge over former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Illinois senator Barack Obama leads Thompson by 12 points and McCain by four points, but trails Giuliani by two points.

On Jun. 27, Giuliani rejected calls for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, declaring, "What happened in Gaza is a microcosm of what's going to happen in Baghdad. It will become something that inflames the entire region." Giuliani also criticized Iran, saying, "You are not going to be allowed to become a nuclear power. No how, no way, just not going to happen."


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 29, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary at 37%, Obama 25%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton remains the top contender in race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in the United States, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 37 per cent of respondents would support the New York senator in a 2008 primary.

Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 25 per cent, followed by former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 13 per cent. Support is lower for New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Delaware senator Joe Biden, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, and Connecticut senator Chris Dodd.

On Jun. 27, Edwards expressed dissatisfaction with the behaviour of right-wing writer Ann Coulter, declaring, "When these hatemongers, with their hate language, continue to speak out, we are not going to sit by quietly anymore. We are past the time for caution and calculation." Earlier this year, Coulter referred to Edwards as a "faggot" during a speech in Washington, and said she wished "he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 29, 2007

Hillary Could Defeat Giuliani in Florida

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton has become the most popular United States presidential hopeful in the Sunshine State, according to a poll by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. At least 44 per cent of respondents would support the New York senator in head-to-head contests against three prospective Republican nominees.

Rodham Clinton holds a six-point lead over former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, a five-point advantage over actor and former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson, and is barely ahead of Arizona senator John McCain.

In other match-ups, Illinois senator Barack Obama is tied with McCain, trails Giuliani by eight points, and leads Thompson by two points. Former U.S. vice-president Al Gore leads Thompson, but trails McCain by one point and Giuliani by nine points.


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 29, 2007

Another Debate, Another Good Night for Hillary Clinton

Thursday night's Democratic presidential debate at Howard University was a lovefest, not a slugfest. The candidates essentially agreed on the issues and frequently displayed a chumminess that suggested most of them would gladly join a ticket led by the eventual nominee. The good will was flowing so freely that, well into the discussion of racial justice, healthcare and education issues. New York Senator Hillary Clinton, D-New York, exclaimed, "It's hard to disagree with anything that has been said."

The candidates vied to impress with rhetorical flourishes rather than jabs.

Even if they had not been appearing on the campus of a historic black university, they would all have expressed appropriate concern about the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday to ease restrictions against segregation in public education. But the fact that the debate took place at Howard brought out the best in the candidates, as they angrily denounced the courts decision to "roll back the clock" on civil rights.

Illinois Senator Barack Obama, the only black candidate on the stage, was especially eloquent in his denunciation of the current court's assault on the protections set in place by the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling that barred state-sponsored school segregation Speaking of the courageous students, parents and civil rights lawyers who fought to bring the Brown v. Board of Education case to the high court more than half a century ago, he mused, "If it were not for them, I would not be standing here." Yet it was not Obama's reference to the civil rights movement, nor former North Carolina Senator John Edwards' "this issue of poverty is the cause of my life" declaration that drew the evening's most passionate response.

Rather, it was a comment by Clinton to the reality of how deeply racial disparities still divide and damage the United States. During a discussion of responses to the AIDS crisis, which had hit young African-American women especially hard, the senator from New York said, "Let me just put this in perspective: If HIV-AIDS were the leading cause of death of white women between the ages of 25 and 34 there would be an outraged, outcry in this country."

Clinton had to struggle to finish the sentence, as the crowd's applause rose to deafening levels. It was a masterful moment; one that, fairly or unfairly, inspired comparisons with the best performances of her husband, Bill. And, while Clinton did not dominate this debate as she did the last one in New Hampshire, she again came off as the most polished of the candidates.

On the AIDs policy question in particular, Hillary Clinton communicated an understanding of the issue at hand that went far deeper than talking points. She seemed to "get it." And the crowd rewarded her with a genuine embrace.


The Nation, June 29, 2007

Minority Voters Support Clinton

WASHINGTON - Not only is Hillary Clinton leading her rivals overall, she is doing surprisingly well among minority voters, a new poll says.

The Gallup Poll's annual minority survey said the New York Democrat is virtually tied with black Illinois Sen. Barack Obama among African-Americans.

And she trounces all her rivals with Hispanic voters - even Hispanic New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.

"Right now, it's pretty much Hillary, and then all the rest," said Gallup's Jeff Jones.

All eight Democratic candidates looked to build their minority support last night in a debate aimed at African-American voters.

According to the survey, Clinton edges Obama with black voters, 43 percent to 42 percent. Among Hispanics, she gets 59 percent support, compared with 13 percent for Obama, 11 percent for Richardson and 7 percent for John Edwards.

Jones said the likely reason Clinton is doing so well among groups that might be expected to follow the historic pattern of being drawn to one of their own is that Clinton is the best-known.

For instance, Jones said Richardson "does better among Hispanics than any other group, but 70 percent of Hispanics still don't know who he is."

Among African-Americans, Clinton is very well-known and well-liked. "That probably has a lot to do with how popular Bill Clinton was," he said.

Obama is also popular, but 24 percent of blacks still don't know who he is.

It seemed unlikely that Thursday night's debate would have a big impact on those numbers, being broadcast on PBS, which has an influential but relatively narrow viewership.

But with the debate held at Howard University, one of the nation's most prestigious black college, and moderated by black journalists, expectations were high for Obama.

Edwards also hoped to gain in a format focusing on domestic issues. His campaign chairman, ex-Rep. David Bonior, has complained that the first two debates were too heavily focused on Iraq and foreign policy.

Overall in the Gallup Poll, Clinton led with 41 percent, followed by 24 percent for Obama and 14 percent for Edwards.

A Fox News Poll out Thursday gave Clinton a slightly larger lead.

By Michael McAuliff, New York Daily News, June 29, 2007

White House poll positions

Opinion on Dem candidates holds steady, while GOP race is more fluid:
WASHINGTON - It is incredibly interesting to look at the vastly different trajectories for each party's 2008 presidential nominating contests, with a dozen Republicans in one contest and eight Democratic candidates in the other. In four Cook Political Report/RT Strategies national polls taken over the last two months, two strong impressions emerge.

The first point that jumps out is that the Democratic contest is remarkably stable, with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York maintaining a consistent 10- or 11-point lead over Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois. Obama, in turn, holds a steady 8- or 9-point edge over former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina. And Edwards is a dozen or so points ahead of the candidate at the top of the second pack.

Over the four Democratic contest surveys, Clinton held 35 percent of the vote, Obama had 24 percent, Edwards had 15 percent, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson had 3 percent and Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden had 2 percent, with 1 percent or less for the others. The most recent sampling showed precisely the same, except that Biden had 3 percent and Richardson had 1 percent.

The four surveys were conducted April 27-29, May 11-13, June 15-17 and June 21-23. A total of 3,439 registered voters were interviewed, including 1,568 Democrats or independents who lean Democratic, and 1,382 Republicans or Republican-leaning independents.

The second strong message is that the Republican race is much more fluid. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani began the year with about 37 percent in Cook/RT polling, staying about 13 to 19 points ahead of Sen. John McCain of Arizona. But in the latest four-poll sequence, Giuliani holds a much narrower lead, 25 percent to 21 percent. The combined sample of Republicans and GOP leaners has a 2.6-point error margin. Former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney were running about even for third place, with 12 percent and 10 percent, respectively. Other candidates received 2 percent or less.

But in the most recent survey of the four, Giuliani (22 percent) and McCain (21 percent) were virtually even at the top, as were Thompson (14 percent) and Romney (12 percent) one level back.

(The poll results for both parties are based on questions that exclude potentially significant candidates who are not in the race and who, unlike Thompson, have not signaled a strong intention to run -- former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on the Republican side and former Vice President Al Gore, the Democratic presidential nominee in).

Using the full four-poll sample, there was a 32-point gap on the Democratic side between the first- and fourth-place candidates, holding steady, while on the GOP side there was a 15-point gap between first and fourth, with first and second dropping and third and fourth rising. This essentially indicates a flattening in the GOP contest.

The stability and even spacing in the Democratic fight suggests it would take fairly dramatic developments to upset this steady order.

The tightening up of the GOP nomination contest, however, with previous front-runners faltering and relatively newer or fresher faces rising, suggests that this is becoming a fight oriented more toward resources and momentum. This puts pressure on the two early front-runners, Giuliani and McCain, to produce the resources to resurrect their earlier premier status, while Thompson and Romney have to show that they can keep up their upward momentum and produce the resources to continue to fuel it still higher. In short, Giuliani and McCain have to play defense from a weaker position than before, while Thompson and Romney are on offense, needing to build on existing momentum.

In the combined June surveys, which tested 1,699 registered voters with a 2.4-point error margin, Clinton and Giuliani were tied with 43 percent each in a head-to-head matchup. She had a narrow lead against Thompson, 44 percent to 41 percent, and led Romney by 46/38.

By Charlie Cook, National Journal, June 29, 2007

Clinton's fine showing should help her in Iowa

Score one for Hillary Clinton.

The New York senator turned in the single most impressive performance during a debate among the Democratic presidential candidates Thursday night in Washington, D.C.

Clinton was crisp, cogent and methodical in her answers. She understood better than any of the other candidates the need for terse answers when so many candidates are given so little time in which to answer questions.

It's more than just a debating skill. American presidents lead the nation through television appearances, and Clinton's performance Thursday night suggests she can do that. She showed she has mastered the ability to put a lot of information into a few seconds on the tube.

She did that by talking more about solutions instead of yammering about how bad the problems are. Some of her opponents, who've had careers in the U.S. Senate or House, didn't get to the point before their time was up.

Her performance Thursday night was so good it should help her cement her lead in polls of the race nationally. In Iowa, where she's not been doing as well as she is across the country, it should help her break away from Barack Obama and try to overtake John Edwards.

Obama held his own, but at this stage in the race, he needed something more stellar to show he's got some depth on issues. (His most memorable moment came when he made it clear he got his HIV test with his wife.) A big disappointment was John Edwards' performance. He let himself get lost in the shuffle. Joe Biden was sometimes too angry and too hot for television. Chris Dodd looked and sounded presidential, as usual, but he was marginalized by being placed next to the loose cannon of the race, Mike Gravel. Gravel and the other minor candidate, Dennis Kucinich, are given no chance of winning the nomination and seem to be doing little in the campaign except showing up for these debates.

Thursday's event was a refreshing change of pace from earlier forums. It dealt with issues such as education that often are eclipsed by discussions of terrorism and the war in Iraq. Also, all candidates got to answer the same question, which helps voters make comparisons. And the nation got to get a look at some of the special problems facing African-Americans. Questions about AIDS, poverty, the high incarceration rates of blacks, Africa and racial discrimination aren't often discussed in prime-time debates, and they got an airing Thursday night.



By David Yepsen, Des Moines Register, June 29, 2007

Voter Panel : Clinton hit a Home Run

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was the runaway winner over the race's lone black candidate in the Democratic debate, according to groups of African-American voters in Harlem and Washington, D.C.

In the nation's capital, 33 undecided voters who identified themselves as people of color and who supported John Kerry in 2004 scored last night's face-off an overwhelming victory for Clinton.

Twenty-seven participants gave the former first lady the nod, compared to just two who went with Barack Obama.

The voters, gathered in a focus group with GOP pollster Frank Luntz on the Howard University campus outside the debate hall, each evaluated the candidates with a "dial machine" linked to a computer - turning the knobs to the right to 100 for great answers, or to the left to 0 for bombs.

Clinton scored consistently in the 80s, while Luntz's panelists panned Obama as flat.

The Harlem panel, organized by The Post, had a more mixed response but still leaned to Clinton. Of 18 voters - eight of whom were truly undecided - six thought Clinton won, two people gave candidate John Edwards the edge, and one gave Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd a nod. Just one viewer thought Obama won, while eight others picked one of the other of the eight candidates on stage.

"I would have liked to have heard [Obama] give more of [Clinton's] answers," said Ernestine Roach, a 66-year-old Harlem denizen who works for the Sanitation Department. Thomas Donaldson, a 41-year-old lawyer supporting Obama, said, "I think [Hillary] spoke forcefully and with conviction . . . I don't think it's a measure of his candidacy. I just think she's a better performer."


By Ian Bishop and Maggie Haberman, New York Post, June 29, 2007

Pure Horserace: Iowa, Iowa, Iowa

Candidates' Schedules Show The Hawkeye State Remains A Key:

(CBS) Halfway through this pre-election year election year, one major piece of the primary puzzle appears to be falling into place and campaigns are using their travel habits to answer a major question - whether Iowa and New Hampshire will retain their traditional importance.

While delegate-rich states like Florida, California, New York (and about two dozen others) have done their best to wrest away some of the influence these two smaller states have held in recent years, Iowa and New Hampshire appear well-positioned to retain their status for 2008. If you need any evidence, just look at the candidates' schedules.

The biggest splash on the campaign trail next week will come from Hillary Clinton's campaign, when former President Bill Clinton joins his wife in joint appearances for the first time. The Clintons are not spending three days talking to prospective voters in California or Florida; they'll be rubbing elbows with potential caucus-goers in Iowa. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney aren't walking in Fourth of July parades in Feb. 5 states like New Jersey or New York; they'll be in Clear Lake and Oskaloosa, Iowa.

In fact, just about all the presidential candidates from both parties are scheduled to be in Iowa next week. John McCain, Rudy Giuliani and John Edwards are the only notable candidates we haven't seen scheduled in the state at some point in the next five days - but they haven't been avoiding the state either.

When Giuliani and McCain decided to skip the Republican straw poll this summer, it could have been a blow to Iowa's stature. But both campaigns remain active there, and Fred Thompson's apparent interest in the straw poll might well add some excitement back into the August event. So far, none of the candidates have even hinted at skipping the state altogether.

Many of the other 48 states have long chafed at the prominence given to Iowa and New Hampshire. Critics ask why two small states, with populations that are overwhelmingly white and middle class, should have the major say in determining the president of a huge, diverse nation. The answers this year are the same as they have always been: Candidates simply get more out of campaigning in Iowa than in states like California, which is almost a nation all its own. It's easier and less expensive to organize and reach actual primary participants. The media attention is greater because journalists, like candidates, can travel the states without taking multiple flights to get from one city to the other. And somebody will win Iowa and New Hampshire and grab at least some momentum.

If all the top-tier candidates, or even most of them, skipped one or both of these states, it might well have a large impact. But that's not going to happen. The Giuliani and Clinton campaigns both have exhibited some level of interest in skipping Iowa - but both have since publicly pledged to go all out to win the caucuses.

This cycle may yet prove to be the last hurrah for the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary, especially if that huge block of states coming soon after reverses the decisions made by those early voters. But six months before the voting begins, the candidates themselves are putting their feet where their strategies are.



By Vaughn Ververs, CBS News, June 29, 2007
Thursday, June 28, 2007

Clinton, Obama Making Big-Money '04 Hopefuls Look Like Amateurs

Here's how fast the money chase has accelerated in the still-early contest for the 2008 presidential nominations: The amounts raised individually between April and June by each of the two leading aspirants for the Democratic nomination appear likely to match or exceed the totals raised in the parallel period by the top five contenders for the party's 2004 nod - combined.

Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois are among the phalanx of candidates who have stepped-up their solicitations for campaign cash to a crescendo this week. This Saturday marks the end of this year's second quarter, and the cutoff point for next batch of money reports that are due to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) by July 15.

What is known, though, is that the cumulative amounts raised by the Democratic contenders will shatter all records, and then some, for money amassed at this point in a presidential campaign cycle by any previous Democratic presidential candidates - including those seeking to challenge President George W. Bush just four short years ago.

To refresh: The most prolific Democratic fundraiser in the second quarter of 2003 was former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who raised $7.6 million between the beginning of April and the end of June that year. Dean - who lost his bid and now chairs the Democratic National Committee - was followed by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry ($5.9 million), the eventual nominee; Connecticut Sen. Joseph L. Liberman ($5.1 million), the 2000 Democratic vice president nominee who is now an independent; then-Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina ($4.5 million), who would become Kerry's vice-presidential running mate; and then-Rep. Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri ($3.9 million). That's a total of $27 million raised by the five leading Democratic hopefuls halfway through the year preceding the 2004 presidential election.

By comparison, Clinton's campaign took in $26 million during the first three months of this year, and expects to report at least as much for the second quarter. "We expect to bring in about what we did in the first quarter, or slightly more, which should put us in the range of $27 million," Howard Wolfson, a longtime Clinton aide, said in an e-mail message to supporters.

Obama's campaign, meanwhile, claims to be approaching a total of 250,000 contributors - an astonishing number that far surpasses that of any other candidate. With the largest contributor base, Obama has the potential to raise even more than Clinton's considerable sums.

Whatever Clinton and Obama report raising in the second quarter, it will not be significantly behind the all-time record-setter for that period in the pre-presidential year: the $34.4 million that Republican George W. Bush raised in the second quarter of 2003.

And, significantly, Bush was the incumbent president at the time and had no competition for campaign funds on the Republican side; Clinton and Obama, on the other hand, are running to succeed Bush in a crowded Democratic field that also includes Edwards, veteran Sens. Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware and Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, among others.


By Greg Giroux, Congressional Quarterly, June 28, 2007

Clinton, Giuliani tied in Ohio, according to poll

Each is favored by 43 percent of voters here, but Giuliani is losing ground in other swing states.

Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani is tied in a head-to-head contest in Ohio with U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., according to a Quinnipiac University swing state poll released Wednesday. Clinton ties Giuliani in Ohio 43 percent to 43 percent.

Clinton is easily leading the Democratic field in Ohio while Giuliani is tops among Republicans.
Giuliani is slipping in both the 2008 general election and Republican primaries in two other critical states: Florida and Pennsylvania.


Clinton tops Obama
Clinton still holds a commanding lead in her own party, leading the closest challenger, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, by 28 points in Ohio and 23 points in Florida. Cast against Republicans, Clinton topped McCain and Thompson in all three states.


McCain has slipped not only in Republican polls, but has lost significant ground against his Democratic rivals. After leading against Obama and Clinton in Ohio on April 26, McCain now trails both, 43 percent to 38 percent and 44 percent to 42 percent.

While Thompson is gaining ground in his own party, match-ups against the three major Democratic candidates show him trailing significantly.

By Mike Kelly, Dayton Daily News, June 28, 2007

Hillary Leads McCain, Giuliani Closer in U.S.

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton could defeat a Republican United States presidential hopeful in 2008, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 46 per cent of respondents would vote for the New York senator, while 42 per cent would support Arizona senator John McCain.

Support for Rodham Clinton in this match-up increased by four points since late May, while backing for McCain fell by six points. In a separate contest, Rodham Clinton holds a one-point edge against former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani.

Yesterday, Rodham Clinton criticized the current government for giving "six years of silent treatment" to Iran, adding, "In this vacuum, Tehran continues its progress toward developing nuclear weapons and increasing its influence in the region."


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 28, 2007
Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Buffett helps raise $1 million for Clinton in N.Y.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Billionaire investor Warren Buffett used his business clout and folksy wisdom to raise $1 million for Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, telling big donors that Democrats are better than Republicans at taking care of the less fortunate.

Buffett has said he admires both Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama and could support either one. He mentioned neither by name as he regaled listeners in the New York event billed as "A Conversation with Hillary Clinton and Warren Buffett." Many of the attendees work on Wall Street. They paid $500 to hear Buffett and the New York senator, $1,000 to attend a separate cocktail party or $4,600 to attend a dinner as well, bringing the take to $1 million, a Clinton spokeswoman said.

The conversation was dominated by Buffett, the Berkshire Hathaway Inc chairman whose investment successes and chatty annual letters have earned him the nickname "The Oracle of Omaha." A relaxed and smiling Clinton said comparatively little and nodded as Buffett spoke.

He recalled a saying, "buy stock in a company that's so good that an idiot can run it, because sooner or later one will." When he added, "now I think that sort of applies to the country too, actually," the audience burst out laughing. "We have an opportunity in 2008 to repair a lot of damage," Buffett said, referring to the election to replace Republican President George W. Bush.

"We have a great economic machine. Our problem is not abundance, but our problem is how we conduct ourselves in the world, what we do for those who don't get the lucky straws in life."
Buffett advocated a beneficent and fair society. "Treat the ones who got the lucky tickets magnificently, but treat everybody at a decent level and just remember, you know, you could have gotten their ticket," he said. "I think the Democrats do a better job of ignoring their own tickets," he said.



By Ellen Wulfhorst, Reuters, June 27, 2007

Clinton, Richardson fault policy on Iran

WASHINGTON - Democratic presidential contenders Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill Richardson on Wednesday urged the Bush administration to continue a dialogue with Iran as the U.S. tries to thwart the country's pursuit of nuclear weapons. In separate speeches, the candidates offered a broad indictment of President Bush's foreign policies, from the Iraq war to the use of unilateral force to relations with Iran and North Korea.

Clinton said the administration has given Iran "six years of the silent treatment." "In this vacuum, Tehran continues its progress toward developing nuclear weapons and increasing its influence in the region," she told the Center for a New American Security. "After initial talks with Iran and Syria on Iraq, the administration says it isn't sure that we need any more discussions with either of them. I think we should keep talking."

The New York senator said U.S. priorities should be bringing troops home from Iraq, demanding that Iraqis take responsibility for their country or lose U.S. aid and intensive diplomacy to restore frayed relationships. "We have a long road ahead to repair the damage that has been done these past six years," she said.

She said she would introduce legislation soon to deal with nuclear terrorism. She said the administration has abandoned nonproliferation efforts, cutting off dialogue with Iran and allowing North Korea to reprocess enough material to make nuclear bombs and test a nuclear weapon. Clinton said she would increase funds for the global threat reduction initiative, ensure the removal of highly enriched uranium from research reactors around the world and create a senior adviser to the president for nuclear terrorism.

By Nedra Pickler, Associated Press, June 27, 2007

Hispanics turning back to Democrats for 2008

SAN ANTONIO - Like no Republican before him, George W. Bush drew Hispanics to the GOP. In the 2004 election, at least 40% of the voters in the nation's largest and fastest-growing minority group backed Bush, double the share of Hispanics who had supported Republican Bob Dole eight years earlier. But the inroads Bush made are vanishing.

The chief beneficiary for 2008 so far is Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton.
In the 2004 election, at least 40% of the voters in the nation's largest and fastest-growing minority group backed Bush, double the share of Hispanics who had supported Republican Bob Dole eight years earlier. But the inroads Bush made are vanishing.

A new USA TODAY/Gallup Poll indicates that Hispanics, by nearly 3 to 1, say they're Democrats or lean that way. Of those, 59% support the New York senator over her presidential rivals - her strongest showing among any major demographic group and a huge potential asset for early contests in Nevada, Florida, California and other states with large Hispanic populations.

One big factor behind the flight from the GOP: a heated debate over immigration in which congressional Republicans' remarks on illegal immigrants have offended many Hispanic voters. The fallout from that battle, shifting Latino loyalties and a changing political calendar have scrambled political calculations made about Hispanics after the last presidential election - and raised the stakes for their role in choosing the Democratic nominee for the next one. Even though the presidential candidates are frantically raising money in the final days before the end of the month - the second-quarter fundraising totals are seen as benchmarks for their standing - all the Democratic contenders accepted invitations to address NALEO, the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials. They will speak to the group's convention in Orlando on Saturday.

Hispanics will be more wary in 2008, Gilda Lopez, 56, a speech pathologist and reliable Democrat. With a crisis in Iraq and questions at home about the GOP's attitudes toward Hispanics, she says, "I cannot understand how a Hispanic person could vote Republican." The new survey finds fewer who say they will. Only 11% of Hispanics now identify themselves as Republicans, down from 19% in 2005, while the proportion who call themselves Democrats has jumped to 42% from 33%. Including independents who "lean" to one party or the other, Democrats lead Republicans among Hispanics 58% to 20%.

In a matchup between the candidates who lead in national polls, Hispanics overwhelmingly support Clinton over Republican Rudy Giuliani, 66% to 27%.

Patti Solis Doyle, campaign manager for Clinton and the daughter of Mexican immigrants, says the New York senator is determined to reverse the gains Bush made. "We did see President Bush make some real inroads among Hispanics, and she is very aggressively going after those votes," says Solis Doyle, Clinton's former scheduler and the first Latina to head a major presidential campaign. Her office is decorated with photographs of her husband and two children, a Diego Rivera print and framed copies of three Time magazine covers featuring Clinton.

The campaign has hired a leading Hispanic pollster, a director of Hispanic outreach and a liaison to Spanish-language media. Clinton also has landed some prized endorsements from top Hispanic officeholders, including Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez.

In part, Clinton's strength among Hispanics reflects the fact that she is the best-known candidate. Many Hispanics also have lingering affection for her husband, who got 62% of the Latino vote in the 1992 presidential election and 72% when he was re-elected in 1996. "I like Hillary," Margaret Crutchfield, a 61-year-old Mexican-American, says after the San Antonio rally for Obama, whom she says she also likes. Then Crutchfield adds, brightening: "I love Bill Clinton."

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, the son of a Mexican mother and American father, also sees Hispanic support as "a critical part of his constituency," campaign manager Dave Contarino says.
But Richardson still has to introduce himself. Six in 10 Hispanics polled say they've never heard of the former congressman and Cabinet member, the first Hispanic to seek the Democratic presidential nomination. He has announced key Latino supporters even in New Hampshire, a state that's less than 2% Hispanic.

Obama, meanwhile, is playing catch-up. Nearly half of Hispanics nationwide say they've never heard of the Illinois senator. Among Hispanic Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, 13% support him. That's his weakest standing among any major demographic group, according to an analysis of combined USA TODAY/Gallup Polls taken this year.


By Susan Page, USA Today, June 27, 2007

Where the Election Stands: June 2007

PRINCETON, NJ -- The 2008 presidential election has gotten off to an unprecedented early start. Many candidates were off and running as the year began. How much has all of the extremely early campaigning for president at this stage of the 2008 race affected voter preferences? On the Democratic side, not much. On the Republican side, not much more.

The Fight for the Nominations

New York Sen. Hillary Clinton established her lead among the Democratic candidates early in the process. Since January there have been two occasions when Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, who has been in second place during most of 2007, came within striking distance of Clinton in Gallup Polls, but she has otherwise maintained her lead, which has ranged from 9 to 19 percentage points. In Gallup's latest poll, conducted June 11-14, 2007, Clinton leads Obama by 11 points among Democrats (33% to 21%).

Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards (a formally announced candidate) and former Vice President Al Gore (who has not ruled out a bid but has said he has no plans to run at this time) have been competitive for third place among Democrats. Each has the support of at least 10% of Democrats, not too far behind Obama, but there has been little indication that either Gore or Edwards (let alone the other Democrats who will campaign for the nomination) are making significant enough gains to challenge Clinton.

The Republican race has seen a jockeying of candidates for second place, while there has been little serious threat to the frontrunner, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, since January. Giuliani emerged as the GOP leader in early February, after having been closely matched with Arizona Sen. John McCain earlier, and has held that position ever since.

Eight in 10 Democrats nationwide, compared with only 6 in 10 Republicans, are satisfied with the choice of candidates for their respective party's nomination. This relative lack of satisfaction on the GOP side could be seen as a sign of encouragement for unannounced Republicans such as Thompson and Gingrich to officially enter the race. The finding that there is a high level of satisfaction among rank-and-file members of the Democratic Party may suggest less of an opportunity for Gore if he were to decide to enter the Democratic field.

Early Measures on the November 2008 Outcome

Seventeen months before the nation chooses its next president, most signs from the political environment favor the Democratic Party. The Democrats have a clear advantage in party identification among the voting-age population, Americans view the Democratic Party more favorably than the Republican Party, and the basic indicators of the nation's mood are quite negative -- something that typically bodes well for the party not currently occupying the White House. Thus, not surprisingly, when asked for their generic party preference for president earlier this year (April 2007), Americans were much more likely to say they would rather see the "Democratic Party's candidate" win the 2008 election rather than the "Republican Party's candidate." The specific Democratic presidential candidates have capitalized on that underlying advantage when matched up against the specific Republican candidates in trial heat questions for the 2008 election.

McCain and Giuliani would appear to present the toughest match-ups for the Democrats at this point. Giuliani is the most positively rated candidate of either party, with a 57% favorable rating in the latest Gallup survey. And while McCain is not rated as favorably overall (47%), he is potent because he has impressive appeal across political parties -- rated much more positively than negatively by independents, and only slightly more negatively than positively by Democrats. The other Republican contenders, Thompson and Romney, are still unknown to roughly half of Americans and thus are not as well positioned to compete against a well-known Democrat.

2008 Election Issues

The situation in Iraq is overwhelmingly seen as the most important problem facing the country today, and is the top issue Americans at this point say they will take into account in their 2008 presidential vote. The degree to which Iraq will continue to dominate the election by next year is unknowable. A scenario in which U.S. troops have begun to withdraw from Iraq by 2008 is not out of the question, nor is a scenario in which the recent "surge" in troops is seen as a success. Each of these would significantly affect the presidential campaign.

Terrorism will probably continue to be a strong underlying issue in the campaign -- Americans may not talk or even think about it much, but concern can be easily activated, particularly if there is another major terrorist event. The economy is almost always a factor in an election. Consumer views of the economy became more positive in January, but are much more negative in the latest June poll, possibly because of gas prices. Healthcare is a rising concern among Americans and has been a major issue in past election campaigns. Immigration will likely remain a campaign issue unless and until Congress passes legislation to address the subject of illegal immigration. Immigration ranks second behind the war in Iraq in Gallup's latest update on the most important problem facing the nation.

by Frank Newport, Jeffrey M. Jones, Lydia Saad, and Joseph Carroll, The Gallup Poll, June 27, 2007

Hillary on International Affairs



At the inaugural forum of the Center for a New American Security, Hillary Clinton gave a vast overview of her stances on international policy. In a speech that touched on numerous areas of her foreign policy experience and ideas, Clinton was critical of the Bush Administration's foreign policies, even making a joke at Vice President Cheney's expense. Her speech ranged from topics like Iraq and Afghanistan to China and Darfur.

She stated America must be the world's leader, but must restore its standing in the world in order to do so. She mentioned a big part in foreign policy is to renew alliances around the world and to work on the following issues: genocide, human rights, nuclear proliferation, and global warming.

On Iraq, she repeated her belief that it is time to bring the troops home. "Iraq continues to steal young American lives," Clinton said. She also said the president has been told by numerous generals and the Iraq Study Group there is no military solution to Iraq, only political, and said if the president does not change course, "any Iraqi government is condemned to failure."

The most significant threat, Clinton said, is nuclear proliferation. She said her administration would have a senior adviser to the president on this specific issue. And her speech also touched on Asia and Africa. In Asia, Clinton said its rising technological power may hurt America. In Africa, she called for a no-fly zone, and possible military action with NATO in Darfur if Sudan did not cooperate. She also said there are "good news stories in Africa."


By Mark Murray, MSNBC, June 27, 2007

NH Poll: Clinton, Romney gain; Edwards, McCain drop

A new poll of likely New Hampshire primary voters by Suffolk University for WHDH-TV shows Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Mitt Romney holding leads in New Hampshire while some top-tier candidates see their support dangerously dropping.

Clinton picked up nine percentage points from when the same poll questioned voters in February. She now has 37 percent support followed by Barack Obama who has 19 percent.
The poll, for the first time, shows slipping John Edwards and rising Bill Richardson tied with 9 points. The poll showed 16 percent were undecided.


For Republicans, Romney held the lead with 26 percent compared to Rudy Giuliani's 22 percent. John McCain was tied with candidate-to-be Fred Thompson at 13 percent. Of Republicans 17 percent were undecided.

The poll question 500 likely New Hampshire voters from June 20-24. The margin of error was 4.38 percent.

By James Pindell, The Boston Globe, June 27, 2007
Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 35%, Obama at 23%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton is holding on to the top spot in the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in the United States, according to a poll by Opinion Research Corporation released by CNN. 35 per cent of respondents would vote for the New York senator in a 2008 primary.

Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 23 per cent, followed by former U.S. vice-president Al Gore with 16 per cent, and former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 13 per cent. Support is lower for New Mexico governor Bill Richardson and Delaware senator Joe Biden.


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 26, 2007

Poll: Young Voters Favor Obama, Clinton

(CBS) Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are the favored presidential candidates of younger Americans, according to a poll conducted by CBS News, The New York Times and MTV.

Eighteen percent say they're enthusiastic about Obama and 17 percent are enthusiastic about Clinton - far more than say the same about Republicans Rudy Giuliani (4 percent), Mitt Romney (2 percent) and potential candidate Fred Thompson (2 percent).

Among those who plan to vote in the Democratic primaries, 29 percent are enthusiastic about Clinton and 26 percent about Obama.

Forty-five percent of younger Americans aren't enthusiastic about any candidate.

If the election were held today, a majority of 17 to 29-year-olds (54 percent) say they'd vote for the Democratic candidate, while 32 percent would vote Republican. Nearly eight in ten younger Americans think their generation will have a lot or some impact on who the next president will be.

And even at this early stage, six in ten say they're paying a lot or some attention to the campaign. That's compared with just 35 percent who said they were paying attention in the summer of 2003, the same point before the last presidential election. Most say the 2008 presidential election is the most important, or one of the most important, in their lifetime. Nearly three-fourths of 17 to 29-year-olds say they're registered to vote, and most of those who aren't say they plan to register before the 2008 election. Not surprisingly, many are using the Internet to learn about the candidates. One-third say they've been to a candidate's Web site and 15 percent have connected to a candidate through social networking sites like MySpace or Friendster.

On the issues, younger Americans name the economy (23 percent) and Iraq (20 percent) as their top concerns, followed by education and the environment. But two-thirds of 17 to 29-year-olds say the candidates aren't paying enough attention to some of their specific topics of concern: student loans, job training, health care for the uninsured and reducing oil use.

Most young Americans don't think being black or female would affect how people they know would view a candidate, but being Mormon or gay or lesbian might.

Only 28 percent think most people they know would vote for a Mormon, and only one in four think most would vote for a gay or lesbian.



CBS News Polls, June 26, 2007

Brown supports Clinton in bid for presidency

U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown announced Monday that she is backing U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton for president.

The Jacksonville Democrat saluted Clinton as having "the best combination of strength, experience and intellect to be president and lead from her first day in the White House. ... As she's repeatedly done as senator, she will bring people together to get results."

The former first lady, in turn, saluted Brown's "tireless work on behalf of our veterans to ensure they get the health care and benefits they need and deserve ... I am honored to have her support."

Brown is a member of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. She was elected to Congress in 1992 after 10 years in the Florida House.

She represents the 3rd Congressional District, which covers parts of Duval, Clay, Putnam, Alachua, Volusia, Marion, Lake, Seminole and Orange counties.


The Florida Times-Union, June 26, 2007

Clinton, Giuliani fortify leads in California

All the campaign visits to California from Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Rudy Giuliani appear to be paying off, according to a new poll released Monday, and Democrat Barack Obama - despite being greeted like a rock star at recent Bay Area rallies - is falling farther behind.

Clinton, who was in Los Angeles last week, is widening her lead among California Democrats to 37 percent, earning overwhelming support from women and non-whites, according to a random survey of 663 California registered voters conducted early last week by San Jose State's Survey and Policy Research Institute.

The former New York mayor, meanwhile, who is planning a trip to Northern California on Thursday, is maintaining a strong, but tighter, lead among the Republican pack with 25 percent support.

With California's primary scheduled for earlier than ever - in February, along with two dozen other primaries and caucuses - the front-runners are quickly solidifying their support and lesser-known candidates are barely registering. "This is one of the outcomes of the early primaries," said survey director Melinda Jackson, an assistant political-science professor at San Jose State University. "We're seeing so much money being raised so early in the race that Bill Richardson and Chris Dodd aren't even able to compete. We're seeing the field shake out pretty quickly."

In a distant second to the New York senator, U.S. Sen. Obama of Illinois and former U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina are tied with 15 percent. Obama is down from a high of 33 percent support in January, when he was running a close second to Clinton. Edwards, whose wife spoke at San Francisco's gay pride parade on Sunday, is slowly moving up.

"Clinton is being swept along by her support among women," said Philip Trounstine, director of the research institute that conducted the survey. "If Edwards, Obama or any other candidate can peel women away from Clinton, the Democrats could have a competitive race in California. But if Clinton keeps her grasp on women, it's not going to be much of a contest here." If she maintains the hold on women - where she has 45 percent support - "she may have this wrapped up already," Jackson added.

In the more competitive Republican field, actor and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, who hasn't formally announced his candidacy, has inched into second place with 16 percent support, with a statistically insignificant lead over U.S. Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

Although California generally tracks three or four points to the left of national polls, Clinton's support appears to be gaining hold across the country. A CNN poll conducted during the weekend shows Clinton at 35 percent support. Obama has a strong presence in second place at 23 percent, followed by former Vice President Al Gore, who hasn't entered the race. Edwards is running fourth at 13 percent.

The San Jose State poll also found President Bush's approval rating in California plummeting to near-historic lows. Among Republicans, his approval rating is no more than 46 percent, and his approval on Iraq among Republicans is no more than 50 percent. Fifty-three percent of Republicans say they believe the president tells the truth, according to the survey. "The American people have been loud and clear in expressing their growing dissatisfaction with the president's performance over the course of his second term," Jackson said. "At the same time, President Bush has remained steadfast in pursuing his chosen policies while ignoring this downward spiral in public opinion."


By Julia Prodis Sulek, San Jose Mercury News, June 26, 2007
Monday, June 25, 2007

National Poll: Clinton 37% Obama 25% Edwards 13%

There are no surprises in this week's polling on the race for the Democratic Presidential nomination. For the sixth straight week, New York Senator Hillary Clinton is in the mid-30s, Illinois Senator Barack Obama is in the mid-20s, and former North Carolina Senator John Edwards is in the mid-teens.

This week's numbers are Clinton 37% Obama 25% and Edwards 13%. A week ago, it was Clinton 38% Obama 27% and Edwards 16%. Clinton has been within three points of the 35% level in seventeen of the last eighteen weekly updates. However, she has been at 35% or above for six of the past seven weeks. Prior to that, she had been under 35% for six weeks.

Clinton is viewed favorably by 80% of Democrats while 69% have a favorable opinion of Obama and 73% say the same about Edwards.

Clinton, in addition to solidifying her role as the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination, now leads Arizona Sen. John McCain by four percentage points in a general election match-up. That's a net gain of ten percentage points for Clinton over the past month. Clinton continues to trail another New York politician, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, by a single point. That's little changed from a month ago.

In this week's poll, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and Delaware Senator Joe Biden each attract 4% of the vote. Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich earns 3%, Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd is the choice of 1%, and former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel attracts about half a point. Thirteen percent (13%) are undecided.

The current survey of 763 Likely Democratic Primary Voters was conducted June 18-21, 2007. The margin of sampling error is +/-4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. The Rasmussen Reports sample includes not only Democrats, but also independents who say they are likely to vote in a Democratic Primary.


Rasmussen Reports, June 25, 2007
Sunday, June 24, 2007

Nevada poll puts Thompson, Clinton ahead

THE RACE: The presidential race for Republicans and Democrats in Nevada:

Democrats
Hillary Clinton, 39 percent
Barack Obama, 17 percent
John Edwards, 12 percent
Bill Richardson, 7 percent


Republicans
Fred Thompson, 25 percent
Mitt Romney, 20 percent
Rudy Giuliani, 17 percent
John McCain, 8 percent


"Law & Order" actor Thompson has not declared his candidacy, yet the former Tennessee senator's ranking in the poll indicates a lack of enthusiasm for other GOP candidates. McCain, an Arizona senator, is at odds with GOP conservatives over his support for immigration legislation, and saw his support fall to single digits.

On the Democratic side, New York Sen. Clinton has had between 37 percent and 40 percent of Nevada Democrats in every poll so far. Gov. Richardson came in fourth despite his focus on Nevada from his neighboring state of New Mexico.

The poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research. The survey was conducted Wednesday through Friday among 400 likely Republican caucus-goers and 400 likely Democratic caucus-goers. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.


The Associated Press, June 24, 2007

Record Setting Night With Clinton in Town

It's one for the record books. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton showed up at Saturday night's Jefferson-Jackson fundraiser dinner for the Arkansas Democratic party. And the turnout of more than 4,000 people made it the largest paid political event in Arkansas history. There was plenty of time to catch up with the former Arkansas first lady, but the presidential campaign naturally still dominated her address.

"When I am president we will have health insurance for every single American. That is a pledge," Senator Clinton told the audience who responded with a roar of applause. She was back in the Natural State for the first time as a presidential candidate. She made her positions known on numerous issues including her desire to bring troops home from Iraq, and the need for independence from foreign oil. She said Arkansas farmers will play a vital role in producing crops to help solve fuel problems. "I'd rather be thinking about Arkansas when I fill up the tank, than folks across the ocean who don't even care about America," she said.

Supporter Jerry Todd said, "I think she's sincere in what she wants to do and I think she has the experience to do it." Those behind the New York senator were thrilled to see her back in Arkansas. State Senator Shane Broadway said, "any time you have a former first lady as prominent as Senator Clinton come to town there's a lot excitement around that."
And supporters' opinions reflect the most recent polls showing Clinton in the lead for the democratic nomination.


Senator Mark Pryor said, "my guess is right now it looks like Senator Clinton will be the democratic nominee and she'll be the next president of the United States." While there's a long way to go in this presidential election, supporters have high hopes for her success. But for now, they're just pleased to see someone with Arkansas ties making a name for herself in the race.

Senator Blanche Lincoln said, "I think Arkansans are very proud. They're very proud of the independent-minded ideas and quality of candidates that come from Arkansas."


By Justin Earley, Fox16 .com, June 24, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 43%, Obama 27%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton holds a large lead in the national race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in the United States, according to a poll by Princeton Survey Research Associates released by Newsweek. 43 per cent of respondents would support the New York senator in a 2008 primary.

Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 27 per cent, followed by former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 14 per cent. Support is lower for Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, Delaware senator Joe Biden, and Connecticut senator Chris Dodd.

On Jun. 22, Biden discussed the current state of affairs in the U.S. Congress, saying, "We do not have effective control of the U.S. Congress. There are 49 Democrats, 49 Republicans, and two independents who caucus with the Democrats, to give the party a majority. You need 60 votes to proceed and 67 votes to prevail over a presidential veto. It's an unrealistic expectation that Republicans will give us enough votes to do that."

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 24, 2007


Rodham Clinton Could Carry New York in 2008


(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton is the most popular presidential hopeful in the Empire State, according to a poll by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. At least 52 per cent of respondents would support the New York senator in head-to-head 2008 presidential contests against three prospective Republican rivals.

Rodham Clinton holds a 15-point lead over former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, a 24-point advantage over Arizona senator John McCain, and a 27-point edge over actor and former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson.

Illinois senator Barack Obama is tied with Giuliani, but leads McCain by 15 points and Thompson by 24 points. Former U.S. vice-president Al Gore holds the upper hand against the three prospective Republican candidates.

In a separate contest-which ponders the possible candidacy of current New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg as an independent-Rodham Clinton is first with 43 per cent, followed by Giuliani with 29 per cent, and Bloomberg with 16 per cent.

In 2004, Democratic nominee John Kerry carried New York's 31 electoral votes, with 58 per cent of the vote. No Republican has won the Empire State since Ronald Reagan in 1984.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 24, 2007

Clinton returns to Ark. for fundraiser

NORTH LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - Hillary Rodham Clinton returned Saturday to Arkansas, where she spent 12 years as the state's first lady, to rally Democrats as she seeks her party's presidential nomination. The New York senator and wife of Arkansas' political son Bill Clinton"I just remember people wanting to achieve things together," she said, standing on a stage in the center of Alltel Arena. "That's the way Arkansas worked best and that's the way America will work best." recalled her days traveling Arkansas and the feeling of camaraderie she had with the people she met.

Clinton called upon an audience of about 4,000 at the Democratic Party of Arkansas' annual Jefferson-Jackson fundraiser to work with her. "I want to be a president who sets goals for America again," she said. "And I want to ask everyone to work together to achieve those goals."

Gov. Mike Beebe, who has not yet announced an endorsement for the 2008 race, told Clinton, "Senator, on behalf of almost three million Arkansans, welcome home."

Unlike her husband, who was governor of Arkansas before he was elected president, Hillary Clinton isn't a native of the state. Still, her supporters say voters will embrace her as one of their own. "Arkansas is in you and we know it and we see it every day," said Rep. Vic Snyder. Sen. Mark Pryor said: "I think she has a special relationship with the state of Arkansas and the people of this state. I think she has a big advantage over anyone, Democrat or Republican, in this state."

By Andrew DeMillo, Associated Press, June 24, 2007

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Sires gives his backing to Clinton for president

Rep. Albio Sires on Friday joined the growing list of elected New Jersey officials to endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., for president.

Earlier this month, Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., endorsed Clinton and was named a co-chairman of the campaign. In April, Governor Corzine endorsed Clinton along with a large group of officials that included Reps. Frank Pallone, D-Long Branch, and Rob Andrews, D-Haddon Heights.

Sires met with Clinton on Thursday in Washington in advance of the announcement. "I've seen firsthand Hillary Clinton's tireless efforts to help the people of New York affected by the attacks of 9/11," Sires said in a news release. "It's just one example of her strength and leadership that make her uniquely suited to be president." Sires became the first Hispanic speaker of the state Assembly in 2002 when James E. McGreevey, then governor-elect, backed him for the post. Sires served as speaker through 2006, when he was elected to fill Menendez's seat in the House.

Clinton noted Sires' work in the Legislature to raise New Jersey's minimum wage and his work as mayor of West New York to increase the availability of affordable housing. "Congressman Sires has been a tireless advocate of initiatives that make a real difference in the lives of working families," Clinton said in a release. "I am honored to have his support."


By Herb Jackson, NorthJersey.com, June 23, 2007

Forget Votes, Now They're Running For Cash

As Fundraising Quarter Ends, Presidential Campaigns Scramble For Dollars:

AP) Republican John McCain and Democrat John Edwards are in danger of losing their place among the leading presidential contenders if their spring fundraising falls too short of earlier totals.
Next weekend marks the end of the latest fundraising period, covering April through June, and the new finance reports will set a benchmark by which to measure the campaigns. Candidates in the crowded field raised a combined $133.5 million over the first three months of the year.

The latest numbers could further cement Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., as the masters of political money. In the January-March period, those two White House hopefuls combined to raise more than $50 million; each is believed on track to match or exceed their first-quarter total.

For Republicans, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are at the top of the money race. But the picture is blurred by the potential entry Fred Thompson, the actor and former senator from Tennessee.

A look at the fundraising picture ahead of the latest reporting period, which ends June 30:

John McCain's stance in support of President Bush's immigration policies has hurt his fundraising. But the Arizona senator has packed his schedule with an average of more than one fundraiser a day this month in hopes of approaching the $13.6 million he raised in the first quarter.

John Edwards' campaign says he will fall $5 million short of his $14 million first-quarter total. On Friday, the former North Carolina senator and 2004 vice presidential nominee sent an appeal to donors that sets a $9 million goal for April through June. While that message probably is an attempt lower expectations, no one disputes that Edwards will fail to keep pace with the earlier total.

Hillary Clinton's campaign promises to match her $26 million haul from the first quarter. She is ending the current reporting period with fundraisers in Chicago, New York and Miami. On Sunday, she planned a large gathering of Indian-American supporters and then a more intimate event hosted by Charles Dolan, the founder and chairman of Cablevision Systems Corp., a New York area cable TV provider. The event of this upcoming week is on Tuesday in New York, hosted by billionaire Warren Buffet and a who's who of investment bankers, hedge fund managers and private equity investors. They include Morgan Stanley's chief executive, John Mack, a fundraiser for President Bush in 2004.

Obama, who raised $25.7 million from January through March, could surpass that total, though aides say they have no chance of beating Clinton. Obama amassed a stunning list of 104,000 donors in the first three months and since has expanded that base. Buffet has offered to raise money for Obama, too, and is expected to do an event for him soon, but not this month.

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, led all Republicans with $20 million last quarter. He might fall short of that tally as the campaign tries to expand its list of 30,000 donors from the first quarter. On Sunday, Romney planned to rent Fenway Park for a barbecue for donors. Aides expected to take in at least $1 million from an event Monday at the TD Banknorth Garden, where the Boston Bruins and Celtics play. A similar fundraiser in January amassed more than $6 million.

Giuliani, who raised $16.1 million last quarter, is expected to be in the same range this time. The former New York City mayor is ending the month with several fundraisers in California.

It would be difficult - but not impossible, some Democrats say - for either Clinton or Obama to match Bush's second-quarter mark of $35 million in 2003 as he marched unopposed to the Republican nomination. Clinton "has locked down the institutional Democratic Party money," said Democratic strategist Anita Dunn, who is not aligned with a candidate in the 2008 race. "And Obama is proving there is actually a universe out there, beyond that, and a very potent one."

Edwards' aides say they are satisfied raising $9 million, with a goal of $40 million by the Iowa caucuses, the leadoff state, in January. The $14 million that Edwards raised early this year doubled the amount he took in during the comparable period in 2003, when he made his first presidential bid. The $9 million target set by the campaign is twice the amount Edwards raised in the second quarter of 2003. "This is not about outraising our opponents in a meaningless fundraising arms race or what any of the other campaigns are doing around us," said Edwards' spokesman, Eric Schultz. "This is about executing our plan, which is raising enough money to push our message in the critical early states, and building strong operations around the country." But Edwards will have to show progress to keep his donors involved. He had led in polls in Iowa, but those surveys have tightened. What's more, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who raised $6.2 million last quarter, could surpass that total and draw within striking distance of Edwards. That would vault Richardson's standing in the contest at Edwards' expense.

Among Republicans, the candidate with the most at stake is McCain. He began the year as the GOP front-runner, yet now trails in national and state polls. He recast his money operation after his third-place finish in the January-March period. But just as he was stepping up his effort, the Senate began to debate changes in immigration law. In the Republican field, McCain is the only candidate who supports the legislation, which conservatives have panned. Over the years, McCain has taken policy positions that, at times, have been in conflict with his own party. A spokesman, Brian Jones, acknowledged that the senator's stands "present some challenges in terms of fundraising." "You have to work harder for the dollars," Jones said. Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio, who is not involved in the presidential contest, said he believes McCain's campaign is "hanging by the fingertips." But he said that even if McCain stumbles, he has a chance to recover. "John McCain has the political capital with the media that before they write him off they will give him the benefit of the doubt," he said.

CBS News, June 23, 2007

After early fireworks, Obama on learning curve

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Democrat Barack Obama exploded into the 2008 White House race on a crusade to cleanse politics: nearly five months of campaign trail rough-and-tumble later, he is still in Hillary Clinton's shadow. Senator Obama, 45, second in national polls in the Democratic race, has yet to puncture the aura of inevitability the pace-setting former first lady is building around her campaign.

Vying to become America's first black president, Obama has dealt in trademark charisma and soaring rhetoric, but shown inexperience, and his lofty idealism has been tested in the brutal arena of national politicking. "He came into the race with such a big bang, but there is a learning curve on the campaign trail," said Dan Shea, a professor of political science at Allegheny College, Pennsylvania.

On average, in national polls in June Clinton led in the Democratic race for nomination with around 35 percent, followed by Obama at 23 percent and former 2004 vice presidential nominee John Edwards at 12 to 14 percent -- roughly where the race has been for months.

In states hosting early nominating contests next year, the race is also forming. A CNN/WMUR poll this month in New Hampshire had Clinton on 36 percent Obama on 22 percent and Edwards on 12 percent.

In Iowa, a recent Mason-Dixon poll put Clinton on 22 percent, Edwards on 21 percent and Obama on 18 percent. Obama led Clinton 34 percent to 25 percent in a snapshot of the race by the same firm in South Carolina, where African-American support is key.

There have also been missteps. Obama recently had to apologize after aides sent out a memo questioning Clinton's ties to India and the Indian-American community. Questions have also been asked in the media over Obama's inexperience, as the next president may have to extricate the United States from Iraq, with the Middle East in flames.

By Stephen Collinson, AFP, June 23, 2007

Clinton Rallies State Democrats

LITTLE ROCK -- Sen. Hillary Clinton, who spent 12 years as first lady of Arkansas, returned Saturday to rally fellow Democrats and to campaign for president. "I think American is ready for a change," she said during a speech at the Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner, the state Democratic Party's biggest event of the year. "Arkansas runs deep in me and always will," she said to the roaring applause of about 4,000 people who attended the event at the Alltel Arena in North Little Rock.

Clinton, D-N.Y., a top candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, entered the arena to a standing ovation and the Jon Bon Jovi song "Who Says You Can't Go Home?" During her 30-minute speech, the wife of former President Bill Clinton asked Arkansans to support her in her run for the Democratic Party nomination, and she spoke highly of Gov. Mike Beebe and the state's congressional delegation. She said Beebe had specific goals when he ran for governor last year, including reducing the sales tax on food and increasing funding for pre-kindergarten programs, and that she will also have specific goals she will implement if elected president.If elected president, Clinton pledged to make quality and affordable health care available to everyone in the United States.

Clinton recalled her days in Arkansas, both as a law professor at the University of Arkansas, as a lawyer and as first lady. "I am so grateful for the friendships that have really been just part of my heart for so many years," she said.

She also said pledged to address the country's energy needs, and said one way would be to develop more biodiesel fuels using Arkansas crops. "We'll have a new energy policy," she said. Clinton also pledged to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq, and to improve America's image around the world. She said the Bush administration will "go down in history as probably the most ill-prepared to govern or at least indifferent to govern that we've ever had."

Beebe and the state's three Democratic congressmen and two U.S. senators all addressed the crowd on a stage in the center of the arena before Clinton. "She has a brilliance that few people can match," Beebe said. "Senator, on behalf of almost 3 million Arkansans, welcome home." Second District Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Little Rock, told the crowd that she may be a senator from New York now, but she will always be an Arkansan. "Arkansas is in you and we know it and we see it every day," Snyder said. "She will be the next president of the United States." Pryor said before the fundraiser he also thought Clinton would win the presidency, and she will do well in Arkansas and other key states, including Florida. "I think she has a special relationship with the state of Arkansas and the people of this state," Pryor said.

By Rob Moritz, The Morning News, June 23, 2007
Friday, June 22, 2007

Achievers' Support Not Enough for Obama

WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama is running well among high-earning, well-educated Democrats in the race for his party's 2008 presidential nomination. But unless he can broaden his appeal, he risks mimicking past flameouts by Gary Hart, Paul Tsongas and Bill Bradley. Those three highbrow Democrats found support from the party's upper-echelon voters and, like Obama, created a lot of early buzz. In the end, all lost the presidential nomination to rivals with wider followings.

A recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll showed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York leading Obama by 33 percent to 21 percent among Democrats and those leaning toward the party, with other candidates dividing the rest. A major source of Clinton's lead was women, who favored her over the fledging Illinois senator by 2-to-1. But Clinton also held big advantages over Obama among lower-income, less educated Democrats. That included a 4-to-1 edge among people earning less than $25,000 a year and a nearly 3-to-1 margin with people who have not attended college. With the two roughly splitting support from the best-educated, highest-earning Democrats, that spells potential trouble for Obama.

The gap is becoming too wide between the upper middle class and everyone else," said Richard Underwood, 50, of Carbondale, Ill., assistant manager of a video store and a Clinton supporter. "I think she understands that, at least I hope she does, and maybe will keep the rich from gathering up all the money and the poor from gathering up none."

Obama, in his third year as senator and with no previous national exposure, remains unknown to one in seven voters, according to a poll this month by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center. They tend to be less educated and lower income, giving Obama a big disadvantage with that group. In addition, Obama's message of optimism and new approaches tends to be attractive to better-off Democrats, political professionals say. Clinton also has a bank of good will with lower-income voters because of their strong bond with her husband, former President Clinton.

Another strong point for Clinton is older voters, a group that tends to vote heavily. While she and Obama roughly split the vote of people less than age 50, she has about a 3-to-1 edge among voters older than that. Lower-income, lesser-educated people vote less frequently than those who are well off, but there are more of them.

AP exit polls during the heat of the 2004 Democratic primaries showed 52 percent of voters lacked college degrees, and 46 percent earned less than $50,000 a year. Clinton is dominating both those groups while essentially running even with Obama for the rest, according to this month's AP-Ipsos poll. Besides Clinton's huge lead among those who have not gone beyond high school, she leads Obama by 11 points among Democrats with only some college. Besides her big advantage among the poorest Democrats, she has a 32 percent to 18 percent advantage with those earning $25,000 to $50,000 annually. Obama has a slight edge among those earning $50,000 to $75,000, and is tied with Clinton among those making more than $75,000.

"I'm just wanting a fresh face and new ideas, basically," said Dale Albright, 29, an attorney and Obama supporter from Orlando, Fla. Such support has proven insufficient for past Democratic contenders. Colorado Sen. Gary Hart gave former Vice President Walter Mondale a challenge in 1984 that ultimately fell short. National surveys by CBS News, and polling of voters in state primaries by the network and The New York Times, consistently showed Hart doing best among higher-income, better-educated Democrats. Eight years later, Bill Clinton won the party's nomination after vanquishing former Massachusetts Sen. Paul Tsongas, who national polling by CBS and the Times showed dominated upper echelon voters. In 2000, former New Jersey Sen. Bill Bradley had his strongest backing from that same segment of the party _ but was handily defeated by Vice President Al Gore for the nomination.

The AP-Ipsos poll involved telephone interviews with 541 adults who said they were Democrats or are leaning toward the party, and was conducted from June 4 to 6. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

By Alan Fram, Associated Press, June 22, 2007

Hillary Clinton to mayors: 'Too many Americans feel invisible'

In a speech before hundreds of U.S. mayors, Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton claimed the Bush administration makes poor Americans feel "invisible" and promised to restore funding to programs promoting economic development, education, crime prevention and the environment in cities. "Too many Americans feel invisible today," she said Friday at the 75th annual meeting of The U.S. Conference of Mayors in Los Angeles. "And quite often you're the only ones who see this."

Clinton cited as abandoned by the Bush administration a single mother struggling to find affordable child care; a father afraid to allow his son to play outside, fearing an injury would lead to expensive hospital treatment; people still homeless in Louisiana and Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina; and a child attending a crumbling school. "You know these people and they're not invisible to you and they're not invisible to me," the New York senator said above growing applause. "And I pledge they will not be invisible to the next president of the United States."

The former first lady said as president she would propose municipal grants for environmental projects that encouraged "green collar" jobs for middle class workers and restore funding for local police departments and Community Development Block Grants that her husband, Bill Clinton, initiated while in office.

By Andrew Glazer, Associated Press, June 22, 2007
Thursday, June 21, 2007

Bill Clinton returns to Iowa, N.H. to campaign for Hillary

NEW YORK --Bubba's back -- for a limited time only, he claimed Wednesday. Former President Clinton said Thursday he's returning to the campaign trail in two critical early voting states on behalf of his wife, but he doesn't expect to do much more in the way of public campaigning for her this year. "I thought we should do maybe one thing in Iowa this year and one thing in New Hampshire together so we can answer questions together about a lot of things we're both interested in," Bill Clinton said. "I don't expect to do a lot of this this year and I don't think it's helpful. I want people to get to know Hillary."

The former president spoke fondly of Iowa and New Hampshire, saying both states had been very good to him in his 1992 and 1996 campaigns. Iowa reminds him of his home state of Arkansas, he said. Long a behind-the-scenes player in his wife's campaign, the former president stepped into the spotlight this week with the announcement of his campaign trips and his humorous turn in a new Web video spoofing the last episode of the Sopranos. The video has been viewed over a million times in 48 hours on Clinton's campaign Web site and elsewhere in the Internet. Bill Clinton said he'd enjoyed taking part in the Sopranos send-up, saying Web videos "give a sense of unvarnished, mass participation in politics which in a big country is hard to do."

Aides say he'll continue to be very active with the charitable foundation that bears his name, and he plans a weeklong trip to Africa next month on the foundation's behalf. But his top priority continues to be "making sure the candidate he believes will be the best president who also happens to be his wife is elected," said his spokesman, Jay Carson. He has increased his fundraising for the campaign since the last quarter, headlining intimate dinners and larger gatherings across the country.

The Clinton's joint campaign trip top Iowa is viewed as especially crucial. Polls there show her in a tough fight with Obama and John Edwards, even as she leads in national polls and most other state surveys. Bill Clinton did not compete in the Iowa caucuses when he first ran in 1992, but he won the state in the general election that year and again in 1996. He credited New Hampshire with his political salvation in 1992, finishing a close second there. He went on to win the state in both the 1992 and 1996 general elections.

Dante Scala, a professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire, noted that Bill Clinton's support in the state came primarily from middle- and working-class Democrats and from men. Campaigning at his wife's side could boost her standing with those groups, Scala said. "I don't think they're feeling desperate or that she is faltering, but my guess is that they are trying to buttress her support," Scala said. "She needs to appeal to middle-class voters and centrists, since progressive types might wonder, 'Is this going to be Bill Clinton's third term?'"

For many voters, joint campaign appearances for the Clintons will also satisfy the curiosity factor: How is this much-scrutinized couple handling a significant role reversal. "People want to see Mrs. Obama, they want to see Mrs. Edwards. They want to see the team," said former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, who co-chairs the Clinton campaign. "He's a terrific surrogate, she's a great candidate, and we'll see an interplay between them which will be very helpful to her."


By Beth Fouhy, Associated Press, June 21, 2007

Inslee backs Clinton, will co-chair energy advisers

OLYMPIA, Wash. - U.S. Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash., endorsed Hillary Clinton for president on Thursday and will serve as co-chairman of her energy and environment advisers. "The people of Washington are ready for change," Inslee said in a statement released by the Clinton campaign.

"There is too much at stake to take chances after the last seven years. We need a candidate who has been through the fire and knows how to lead. "Hillary Clinton has the vision to lead this country in a clean-energy revolution. She has the toughness, experience, and resolve needed to end the Iraq war and begin rebuilding America's image around the world."

Inslee said in an interview that it was tough taking sides in a nomination battle that has drawn stellar candidates, but that his long admiration for the senator and former first lady won his support. For Clinton, global warming, energy and the environment "aren't just an issue, but a real passion," he said. Inslee's co-chairwoman on the panel of energy advisers will be Carol Browner, former head of the Environmental Protection Agency. Clinton has the strength to end the Iraq War and to help re-establish U.S. credibility abroad, he said. "She is uniquely suited to the moment," he said.

Inslee serves the Seattle-area 1st District and previously served Eastern Washington in the Legislature and Congress. He has run for governor, served as a local prosecutor and been regional director of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Inslee on Friday planned to introduce his New Apollo Energy Act to promote clean and renewable energy and legislation to protect public lands. "I deeply admire Jay's tireless efforts to preserve our environment and promote clean energy for America," Clinton said through her campaign office. "I'm delighted that he will advise our campaign and help lead our effort in Washington."

By David Ammons, Associated Press, June 21, 2007
Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Clinton Draws Cheers From Liberal Group

Appearing before a liberal group that booed her last year for not supporting a firm deadline for withdrawing troops from Iraq, Sen, Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) came armed with more antiwar positions on some issues and received a much more favorable reception today.
Activists from the antiwar group Code Pink booed Clinton, shouting, "End the war now!" But they were drowned out by cheers as Clinton talked about her vote last month against $95 billion in funding for the war and about a bill she wrote to remove President Bush's authority to wage the war. "I see the signs, 'Get us out of Iraq,' " she told a conference of the Campaign for America's Future, a liberal activist group. "That is what I'm trying to do."


Over the last year, Clinton has embraced firm deadlines for withdrawing troops and has made her pledge to "end the war in Iraq" one of her signature lines on the stump. Her aides said she has shifted as conditions in Iraq have become more dire. "The American military has succeeded. It is the Iraqi government which has failed to make the tough decisions that are important for their own people," Clinton said. Generally, activists said that while they wish Clinton and other leaders would do more in Congress to end the war, they were happy that Clinton's position on the issue has changed.


By Perry Bacon Jr., Washington Post, June 20, 2007

Hillary Clinton, Working-Class Hero

Pretty much every poll taken since the beginning of the year has shown two things: First, that Hillary Clinton enjoys a sizeable cushion among working-class voters (a Gallup poll out Monday shows Hillary with a 10-point lead among voters with "some college" and a 23-point lead among voters with a high school education or less). And second, that Hillary has a huge advantage on questions about which candidate has the "best experience" to be president (66 to 9 over Obama in an early June Washington Post poll).

These two details are not unrelated. In fact, it's pretty clear that working-class voters favor Hillary over Obama largely because they value experience. But it's the reason they value experience that's so interesting: Working-class Democrats, and particularly unionized Democrats, tend to see seniority as the only acceptable way of divvying up sought-after work. (And what is the presidency if not the most sought-after job on the planet?) For them, the problem with an inexperienced candidate isn't that he or she is unprepared to be president. It's that such a candidacy flies in the face of their basic sense of fairness.

Of course, it's possible that voters think experience is substantively, as opposed to just symbolically, important. But I doubt it. Consider the following paradox: Voters routinely tell pollsters that experience matters in their choice of presidential candidate. The most obvious reason to demand experience, as my colleague John B. Judis has written, is that the American president has nearly unchecked power over U.S. foreign policy. And yet the pre-presidential experience of four out of the last five White House occupants has consisted of governing a state - a job that affords few opportunities to dust off those Metternich quotes. It's not that governors lack experience per se. Running a state is tough work. There's a legislature to deal with, a bureaucracy to manage, powerful interest groups to navigate. Anyone who succeeds at these tasks must have genuine political skill. But the fact that this experience is irrelevant to the most important responsibility a president will face suggests voters don't necessarily deem experience to be important in its own right.

In the case of Hillary v. Obama, experience turns out to be most useful as a proxy for the vast sociological chasm between the two camps. On the one hand, many of Hillary's most loyal supporters lack college degrees and toil away at low-skilled jobs. Now if you happen to be a poorly educated worker who's nonetheless eking out a decent living, no prospect is more alarming than the thought of losing out one day because someone a little younger, a little flashier, leapt ahead of you in line. There is a comforting order to the world you know. And that order demands that people pay their dues before getting promoted. The alternative is a bitter competition between you and your co-workers - and who knows how you'll fare in that?

In the eyes of working-class Democrats, Hillary is someone who's paid her dues - first in the White House, where she weathered a terrific, eight-year assault from conservatives, then as the scrupulously dependable senator from New York. If, after all this, Hillary doesn't win the nomination, then the system they've bought into their entire working lives will have been turned upside down.

Obama's base, by contrast, consists primarily of his sociological peers: highly educated achievers who get paid to think abstractly and believe that compensation should reflect performance. Nothing makes these meritocrats shudder like the thought of having the sharpest insight or the best proposal and yet still having to cool their heels while their less able, less creative elders plod ahead. Even among educated voters (as opposed to voters in general), it's not hard to pick out the Obama supporters. They're the charter-school entrepreneurs as opposed to the public-school teachers; the management consultants rather than the government lawyers; the hot-shot hedge-fund managers rather than the stodgy CEOs.

For these people, the idea of a candidate paying his dues is absurd. If Obama is the most intelligent, most dynamic, most articulate candidate in the field, then he should be the nominee, regardless of how many years he may or may not have languished in the Senate.

If you want a feel for how all this might play out in the Democratic primaries, you could do worse than to read Illinois Senator Donne Trotter's pronouncement on the matter this past weekend. "Well, it's a big leap from here to there," Trotter told the AP, referring to Obama's plan to move from the Illinois statehouse to the White House in a brisk four years. But, Trotter hastened to add: "I couldn't say he wouldn't be up to the task." Think of Trotter as a kind of median voter on the experience question - someone genuinely ambivalent about the importance of the attribute. On the one hand, Trotter concedes that Obama is prepared to be president. On the other hand, he seems slightly affronted that a man whose political resume is not much more impressive than his own would be considered presidential material. My guess is that if you can figure out who'll win the Donne Trotters of the world, you will have found your Democratic nominee.

By Noam Scheiber, The New Republic, June 20, 2007

Celine Dion "thrilled" her song chosen as Hillary Clinton campaign theme

WASHINGTON -- Hillary, meet Celine.
The New York senator's run for the Democratic presidential nomination took on a distinctly Canadian flavour Tuesday when her campaign announced it had chosen Quebec songstress Celine Dion's 'You and I' as the candidate's official campaign song. In a statement, Dion said she was thrilled by Clinton's choice of her song, now destined to become ubiquitous at the senator's campaign appearances across the U.S. "My fans have always wanted to hear my music on special occasions, weddings and other very cherished moments," Dion said. "I'm flattered that the fans voted 'You and I' for this occasion." Clinton's Internet song campaign has been hugely successful in drawing traffic to her presidential website, with more than one million views of videos produced to promote the contest. The idea highlights the growing impact the Internet is playing in the 2008 presidential campaign, even if only on matters less substantial than Iraq war policy. Clinton broke new ground in January by announcing her White House candidacy on her website. Indeed, her choice of Dion's song seemed almost secondary in importance to the web video that introduced the winning tune. "What candidates want to do is to reach out to people who are enmeshed in the popular culture but not voting," says Richard Davis, a Brigham Young University political scientist who has written several books on the impact of the Internet in modern campaigns. The song contest is part of Clinton's broader efforts to simultaneously appear more hip to younger audiences while also showing she is savvy to new campaign technology," says Davis. "As far as having supporters pick her campaign song, it allows people to feel vested in the campaign," he said. "It's a fairly trivial issue, but supporters get to exploit the interactivity that is there with the Internet and also to get media attention."

By Sheldon Alberts, CanWest News Service, June 20, 2007

Texas Turning Purple Before 2008 Ballot

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - The 2008 United States presidential election in the Lone Star State could be very close, according to a poll by Texas Lyceum. 32 per cent of respondents would vote for Republican former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, while 31 per cent would support Democratic New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Rodham Clinton also trails Republican Arizona senator John McCain by one point. In other match-ups, Democratic Illinois senator Barack Obama is 10 points behind Giuliani, and seven points behind McCain. More than a third of respondents remain undecided at this early stage of the campaign. In 2004, Republican George W. Bush-a former governor of Texas-carried the state's 34 electoral votes, with 61 per cent of the vote. No Democrat has won the Lone Star State since Jimmy Carter in 1976.

Polling Data:
2008 Presidential election match-ups
Rudy Giuliani (R) 32% - 31% Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)

Rudy Giuliani (R) 32% - 22% Barack Obama (D)

John McCain (R) 36% - 35% Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)
John McCain (R) 32% - 25% Barack Obama (D)


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 20, 2007

Iowa poll gives Clinton slight edge, suggests GOP shift

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Hillary Clinton has inched ahead of former Sen. John Edwards in a tightening Democratic presidential race in Iowa, while the Republican race is shifting in surprising ways, according to a new poll made available exclusively to McClatchy News Service and NBC News. The poll by Mason-Dixon Polling and Research Inc. showed that Clinton, D-N.Y., has the support of 22 percent of likely caucus voters in Iowa, with Edwards, D-N.C., right on her heels at 21 percent. Illinois Sen. Barack Obama was third at 18 percent. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson placed fourth with 6 percent. Edwards had an average 3 percentage-point lead over Clinton in Iowa last month in five national polls, with Obama an average 7 points behind Edwards. Clinton's small lead in the Mason-Dixon poll falls within the survey's margin of error -- plus or minus 5 percentage points -- but indicates support for her is growing in the state that will hold the first nominating contest for Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, on Jan. 14. The Mason-Dixon poll also revealed some seismic shifts among Republican candidates, with one undeclared candidate gaining serious ground and two top-tier candidates slipping badly. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney led the field with 25 percent. Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, who has yet to formally enter the race, polled 17 percent. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani had 15 percent. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee placed fourth at 7 percent. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., once considered the favorite to win the Republican nomination, won only 6 percent support from likely Republican caucus voters in Iowa, tying him with Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. McCain's fall in Iowa has been steep: He enjoyed average support of 19 percent in five national polls last month, only 1.2 points less than front-runner Romney, according to RealClear Politics.com. Giuliani also appears to be losing altitude; he averaged 18.6 support in five Iowa polls last month.

By William Douglas, Miami Herald, June 20, 2007
Tuesday, June 19, 2007

How to Save Barack - Avoiding a crushed presidential campaign

When a somewhat racy music video of a woman with the hots for a presidential candidate causes the biggest stir in about two months, as in the case of Barack Obama recently, it's a sign that a campaign has hit a plateau. Polls over the last month have consistently shown Senator Obama a strong second, but still considerably behind frontrunner Hillary Rodham Clinton. The Illinois Democrat performed fine in both debates so far, but nothing he said or did those evenings changed the dynamics of the race. Jerome Armstrong, the former Dean campaign staffer who is one of the most influential voices among liberal bloggers, concluded, "Obama's running a well-funded, traditional presidential campaign that's safely pointed toward finishing a strong second based on his personal appeal. I can see Obama getting a lot of points in the game, but never the lead."

So how does Obama get out of his current nice-but-not-enough blahs? How does he overtake Hillary? The Washington Post conducted a usefully detailed poll on how Democratic-primary voters feel about their three leading candidates, Clinton, Obama, and John Edwards. They found voters felt that Hillary was the strongest leader, the most experienced, the most trusted to handle a crisis, and the one with the best chance of winning.

So what's left? Well, Obama ranked just behind Hillary on "understands the problems of people like you," was ranked the “most inspiring," and led solidly on "most honest and trustworthy." Those areas represent Hillary Clinton's soft underbelly, and that is where Obama is going to have to heighten the contrast.Obama has to do this while not appearing to go negative. And it's not clear that he can count on any other Democratic candidate to do any real damage to the frontrunner. Edwards has hit Clinton pretty consistently since he entered the race, with limited results. Some of the other candidates, like Bill Richardson, actually defend Hillary (a.k.a auditioning for veep). The ones who truly go after her, like Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel, are too far out on the fringe to make an effective attack. And the no-negative-campaigning rule in the Democratic primaries is pretty serious: When Dick Gephardt went after Howard Dean before the Iowa primaries, both candidates saw their numbers plummet, an act that campaign wags called "a murder-suicide."


By Jim Geraghty, National Review Online, June 19, 2007

Clinton, Edwards want some troops staying in Iraq

Washington - - Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards said Tuesday that at least some U.S. troops should remain in or near Iraq for the foreseeable future. Although both reiterated their positions that the U.S. should quickly begin to withdraw troops from Iraq, they made clear that they did not support a total pullout. "We may still have remaining vital national security interests that are important to America," said Clinton, the junior senator from New York, to a labor forum in Washington. "We cannot let al Qaeda have a staging ground in Iraq." She added, "That doesn't take a lot of American forces." Edwards, who spoke after Clinton, told the union members that U.S. forces must be stationed close to Iraq so they can re-enter the nation if necessary. Obama seemed to suggest the U.S. should not be overly hasty in withdrawing forces. "The best option, I believe, is to make certain that we begin a phased redeployment, that we're as careful getting out as we were careless getting in," he said. All three candidates were warmly received at the forum, which was sponsored by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

By Bill Sammon, The Examiner, June 19, 2007

Influential Indian-Americans support Clinton

On Sunday Indian-Americans for Hillary Clinton - a group that supports her 2008 campaign - will host a fundraising event in New York that could net the former first lady between $500,000 and $1m. Among other wealthy Indians, Lakshmi Mittal, the London-based steel magnate, is expected to attend. With all the presidential candidates scrambling to meet their second quarter fundraising targets by the end of this month, Mrs Clinton's ties with the increasingly wealthy 2.3m-strong Indian-American community could prove very helpful. Just as helpful was a memo written and leaked last week by junior campaign staff for Barack Obama, who is trailing Sen Clinton in the Democratic race, which made fun of her ties to prominent Indian-American business leaders. Entitled Hillary Clinton "D-Punjab" (Democratic senator for the Indian state of Punjab), the memo outlined Mrs Clinton's allegedly hypo­critical links to groups that have transferred US jobs to India while at the same time the senator claims to stand up for ordinary Americans. Mr Obama, who has garnered enthusiasm among Indian-American students, apologised for the memo, which he described as "caustic" and "stupid" and which he said he had not authorised. But the damage from what some Indians see as the memo's borderline prejudiced undertones could prove hard to undo. "In addition to being offended by the clear anti-Indian sentiment in the memo, we were particularly disturbed because the memo flies in the face of what we respect most about Senator Obama - his inclusive message and his ability to relate to people of all backgrounds," said a statement by South Asians for Obama. Alienating Indian-Americans is an increasingly expensive prospect in US politics. With a median income of $61,000 compared with a national median of $41,000 according to the US census bureau, Indians are the richest ethnic group in America. More than 300,000 Indians work in Silicon Valley, where their average income is $200,000. "There is a lot of support for Hillary because she has stuck by Indians on the two issues that most motivate us - defending offshoring and supporting the US-India nuclear deal," said a leading Indian business executive in San Francisco. In an interview with an Indian online magazine, Mr Obama insisted that he supported an open economy, including offshoring. "I hope and trust that all my friends in the Indian-American community understand that it [the memo] did not reflect my views, either on the complex issue of outsourcing or on my attitude towards the enormous contributions of the Indian-American community that they have made to this country," Mr Obama told India Abroad.


By Edward Luce, Financial Times, June 19, 2007

Clinton stands as front-runner, but national map scrambles race

WASHINGTON --Hillary Rodham Clinton is the national front-runner in the eight-person Democratic presidential primary. Yet when it comes to the state-by-state contests that will decide the nomination, the candidates are practically all over the map. John Edwards is the favorite in the initial state of Iowa. Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois is giving chase in several states and has as much money as Clinton to fund a tough challenge. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is making a play in states where his Hispanic heritage could establish a bond. Sens. Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Joe Biden of Delaware are trying to break through in targeted states where they feel they have appeal.
And if former Vice President Al Gore gets in the race, it would be turned upside down.
Winning the nomination comes down to one magic number -- 2,182. Fundraising is critical because money pays for the staff to organize key states and the television advertising that influences voters. Clinton and Obama each brought in about $25 million in the first quarter, putting them in a strong position. Edwards, the 2004 vice presidential nominee, raised $14 million.
The primary calendar and number of delegates are still in flux, but here's how the early states are shaping up seven months before the voting begins in Iowa.

NEW HAMPSHIRE -- Jan. 22 (22 delegates)
The state is Clinton's to lose. She has locked up most of New Hampshire's institutional power and recent polls show her leading with more than a third of Democratic support. This is the state where her husband staged his comeback in 1992 and the Clintons have many friends there still.

SOUTH CAROLINA -- Jan. 29 (45 delegates)
Several Democrats claim this state. It is Obama's best chance for victory among the earliest states, with black voters traditionally comprising nearly half the primary turnout. Obama has hundreds of volunteers in the state and his campaign plans to pair those grass-roots efforts with heavy television advertising. A Mason-Dixon poll this month showed Obama pulling in a third of Democratic voters, compared to a quarter for Clinton. Clinton is not ceding the black vote, however, and benefits from her husband's immense popularity in the black community. Edwards was born there and won the primary in 2004. He's focusing on rural and poverty outreach this time to keep it in his column, although he was at just 12 percent in the latest poll. A potential dark horse is Biden, who has spent considerable time in the state and has won several important endorsements from local black leaders.

FLORIDA -- Jan. 29 (185 delegates)
Florida will be the first large, ethnically diverse state to host an early voting contest; it's also a key fundraising stop for presidential hopefuls. Most candidates have been slow to build campaign organizations here as Florida Democrats sort out a dispute with the national party over the earlier primary date and possible penalties. Clinton, who has a strong lead in recent Florida polls, will play hard in the state that decided the 2000 election, and Obama will do so as well.

MEGA TUESDAY -- Feb. 5 (As many as 25 states and at least 1,370 delegates)
This is the first day that states other than Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina are allowed to hold their contests under party rules. And the states have been lining up to go on Feb. 5, perhaps as many as 25. The national primary day is creating headaches for the campaigns as they try to figure out where to spend time and money. Split decisions in those early contests -- Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina -- could truly scramble the dynamics of 2008's biggest multistate contest.

The major prize is California (370 delegates), where Clinton and Obama have already been the toast of numerous Hollywood fundraisers. In a state so vast, candidates typically rely on expensive television advertising instead of traditional retail campaigning. But Clinton has hired an experienced campaign staff and has lined up key endorsements including Antonio Villaraigosa, the popular Los Angeles mayor. The campaign also is assembling a strategy to target the state's large number of absentee voters, many of whom will begin casting their ballots before the Iowa and New Hampshire contests.

Clinton holds a natural advantage in her adopted home state of New York (232), which also hosts its primary. So does neighboring New Jersey (107), and the state's fundraising powerhouse Sen. Bob Menendez has lined up with Clinton after much courting from the field.

Edwards, a North Carolinian, is expressing confidence that he will win several Southern states casting votes that day, including Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Missouri and Oklahoma, although significant numbers of black voters in some of those state could give the edge to Obama or Clinton. Also voting on Feb. 5 are the home states of Richardson, Dodd and Biden, although they have smaller numbers of delegates at stake.

By Nedra Pickler, Associated Press, June 19, 2007

Clinton issues tough warning to Iraq

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton on Tuesday warned Iraqis must decide if they want to stop killing one another, and pledged to bring US troops home. Clinton had harsh words for the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, as she called on President George W. Bush to begin withdrawing US troops from the country immediately. "The Iraqis have to decide whether they want to continue killing each other," Clinton told a forum organized by AFSCME, America's largest public employee and healthcare union in Washington. "It is not just one group against another group, it is multiple groups," she said referring to raging sectarian violence in Iraq. "When our young men and women are on the street in Baghdad they often don't know what is happening, they don't know who's side they are supposed to be on," said Clinton. "I think it is time that we start bringing our troops home."


AFP, June 19, 2007
Monday, June 18, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 39%, Obama 19%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Almost two-in-five Democratic Party supporters in the United States believe Hillary Rodham Clinton should become their presidential nominee, according to a poll by American Research Group. 39 per cent of respondents would vote for the New York senator in a 2008 primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 19 per cent, followed by former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 13 per cent. Support is lower for New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Delaware senator Joe Biden, retired general Wesley Clark, Connecticut senator Chris Dodd, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, and former Alaska senator Mike Gravel.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 18, 2007

National Poll: Clinton 38% Obama 27% Edwards 16%

New York Senator Hillary Clinton 38%. Illinois Senator Barack Obama 27%. Former North Carolina Senator John Edwards 16%. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone poll shows little change in the race for the Democratic Presidential nomination. A week ago, it was Clinton 37%, Obama 25% and Edwards 11%. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson attracts 3% of the vote. Delaware Senator Joe Biden gets 2% and three other candidates attract 1% each (Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd, Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, and former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel). Eleven percent (11%) remain undecided. It is interesting to note that 81% of likely Democratic Primary Voters currently express support for one of the top three candidates. During January, the top tier commanded only 62% of the vote. In February, they earned the support of 66%. For the past several months, Clinton, Obama, and Edwards have jointly attracted 77% of the vote on average. Barring a major mistake by one of the big three candidates, it is difficult to envision a scenario for any of the second tier candidates to capture the nomination. Stability remains the key defining factor of the race, although Clinton seems to solidifying her position as frontrunner. She has been within three points of the 35% level in sixteen of the last seventeen weekly updates. However, she has been at 35% or above for five of the past six weeks. Prior to that, she had been under 35% for six weeks. Illinois Senator Barack Obama is at 27% this week following four straight weeks at 25% or 26%. Former North Carolina Senator John Edwards bounced back this week and now earns 16% of the vote. Prior to last week's poll showing just 11% support for Edwards, the 2004 Vice Presidential nominee had been in the 14% to 18% range for eleven consecutive weeks. The current survey of 775 Likely Democratic Primary Voters was conducted June 11-14, 2007. The margin of sampling error is +/-4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. The Rasmussen Reports sample includes not only Democrats, but also independents who say they are likely to vote in a Democratic Primary.

Rasmussen Reports, June 18, 2007

Craig Crawford's Trail Mix: Poll Suggests Gore Entry No Threat to Clinton

If Al Gore runs for the Democratic presidential nomination, the former vice president appears to draw evenly from the top two contenders, Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois. Each loses roughly five percentage points to Gore if his name is included among the hopefuls, according to a new nationwide Gallup survey of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. Clinton holds a wide lead over the field, either way - suggesting that a Gore run might not affect the outcome at all. With Gore included, Clinton still handily leads the pack at 33 percent while Obama gets 21 percent to Gore's 18 percent, a statistical dead heat for second place. Take Gore out of the equation and the Gallup poll shows Clinton at 39 percent and Obama at 26 percent. John Edwards trails badly in either scenario, posting 11 percent at fourth place with Gore in the mix and back to third place at 13 percent without Gore.

By Craig Crawford, Congressional Quarterly, June 18, 2007

Bill Clinton to campaign with Hillary in Iowa

DES MOINES — Former President Bill Clinton will campaign with Sen. Hillary Clinton over the Fourth of July holiday, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign announced Monday. The three-day trip, from July 2 through July 4, will mark the first time the couple has campaigned together this cycle, although they have attended fundraisers together, spokesman Mark Daley said.


By Charlotte Eby, Quad-City Times, June 18, 2007

Hillary Clinton plants trees, reaps cash

BUFFALO, N.Y. - Sen. Hillary Clinton visited western New York on Monday with trees on her mind planting some and shaking others to help finance her presidential campaign. The New York Democrat started the day in candidate mode at a $500-a-plate fundraising breakfast at Kleinhan's Music Hall as new poll results showed her with a double-digit lead over Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. Moving on to Senate duties, Clinton visited a school with Mayor Byron Brown, where she distributed seed packets from a white ash tree from Eleanor Roosevelt's Hyde Park estate and grabbed a shovel to help plant two seedlings. The planting ceremony gave Clinton a chance to help Buffalo replace trees lost in a surprise October snowstorm while promoting her broader energy and environmental policy. In a similar two-for-one later, Clinton met with officials in Rochester about that city's crime rate while addressing national anti-violence initiatives. In that way, Clinton said, she sees her presidential run as a positive for New York. "There's a linkage between everything I do in and for New York and what I'm trying to do on the campaign trail and what I want to do as president," Clinton said at City Honors High School, where a lawn full of children awaited her arrival for more than an hour. "You can talk about global warming right here in Buffalo while we're planting trees that are going to benefit the people of Buffalo, and I want to make those connections," she said. The breakfast, and a Rochester fundraiser, were expected to raise $300,000, according to the campaign. Nationally, Clinton was leading Obama in the Democratic race by 33 percent to 21 percent in an Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted earlier this month. A USA Today/Gallup Poll released on Monday showed almost identical results. "I'm just doing this campaign one day at a time and I believe we're picking up support throughout the country," Clinton said of the results, "and what I've found is that the campaign itself brings people to a greater awareness of what I stand for, who I am, what kind of president I will be." At the morning fundraiser, which was closed to the press, Clinton said her message was about setting goals for the country. "I know we can have universal health care," she said. "I know we can have an independent secure energy source and combat global warming. We can make college affordable again, and so many other goals I know would be good for our country."


By Carolyn Thompson, Associated Press, June 18, 2007

Obama calls Clinton memo dumb mistake

NEWTON, Iowa (AP) - Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama on Monday said his campaign made a "dumb mistake'' when it circulated a memo criticizing rival Hillary Rodham Clinton's financial ties to India. In an interview with The Associated Press, Obama disavowed the memo which carried the headline - Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab) - and referred to Bill and Hillary Clintons' investments in India; her fundraising among Indian-Americans; and the former president's $300,000 in speech fees from Cisco, a company that has moved U.S. jobs to India. "It was a dumb mistake on our campaign's part and I made it clear to my staff in no uncertain terms that it was a mistake,'' Obama told the AP in a brief interview in which he referred to the memo as "unnecessarily caustic.'' Last Thursday, Obama's campaign sent the memo to reporters, demanding that it not be attributed to their campaign. The Clinton campaign obtained the document and sent it to journalists. Since then, it has created a furor in the Indian-American community and raised questions about Obama's claims that he is above attack politics. "It is not reflective of the long-standing relationship I have had with the Indian-American community,'' Obama said in the interview. "The issue of outsourcing is a genuine and important issue but to refer to one particular country was, I think, an error and I let all of us know that we've got to be more careful about how we communicate," he said. In a statement on his Web site, Obama said he was not aware of the contents of the memo before it was distributed. The Illinois senator said he was responsible for the mistake and the campaign had taken appropriate action "to prevent errors like this from happening in the future."

By Mike Glover, Associated Press, June 18, 2007
Sunday, June 17, 2007

Clinton sets sights on women voters

At an upcoming Miami fundraiser, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will try to widen the gender gap in Florida with her male rivals. But some prominent Florida women are not on board. Sisterhood is powerful, the slogan goes, so powerful that women are propelling Sen. Hillary Clinton to the front of the Democratic pack in Florida and nationwide. Twice as many female voters chose her over her leading rival, Sen. Barack Obama, in a recent Zogby International poll conducted for The Miami Herald. Overall, 39 percent of the Florida women surveyed picked Clinton over her seven male opponents, contributing to her 20-point lead. She was the top fundraiser in Florida during the first three months of the year, and three of her top corporate contributors were businesses run by women. Clinton will try to widen the gender gap even further when she comes to Miami for a June 30th ''women's breakfast'' hosted by prominent female politicians and Democratic donors. The campaign to elect the first female president resembles the ethnic politics that have long defined campaigns in diverse states like Florida, where African-American, Hispanic and Jewish voters typically support candidates from their communities. ''She is playing the women card, and she should,'' said Paula Xanthopoulou, former president of the Florida chapter of the National Women's Political Caucus.

By Beth Reinhard, Miami Herald, June 17, 2007

Poll: Clinton establishes healthy lead over Obama

WASHINGTON - New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has regained a double-digit lead over Illinois Sen. Barack Obama in the USA TODAY/Gallup Poll two weeks after the survey found the Democratic presidential rivals essentially tied. Among Republicans, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani remains ahead, but former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson, who hasn't formally entered the race, for the first time edges into second place over Arizona Sen. John McCain. The results show a Republican race that could be roiled by Thompson, who is targeting conservatives unsatisfied with their choices in the field so far. He is costing Giuliani most: A third of Thompson's supporters say they would otherwise back the former mayor. The Democratic contest generally has been stable, though a USA TODAY Poll taken June 1-3 had shown Obama 1 percentage point ahead of Clinton, 30%-29%. In the new survey, Clinton leads Obama 33%-21% if former vice president Al Gore - who has neither entered the race nor ruled it out - is included among the candidates. She leads by 39%-26% if Gore isn't included. Former North Carolina senator John Edwards is then third at 13%. "There have been 500 stories and 500 polls, but actually little has changed in this race," says Mark Penn, Clinton's chief strategist. "She has a consistently strong lead that is holding up over time." The new poll includes 334 Democrats and 182 independents who lean Democratic. Frank Newport, editor in chief of the Gallup Poll, said the previous poll "either picked up a short-term change or ... was a function of unusual sampling, which happened to pick up Democrats who were more pro-Obama than the underlying population." The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll and the Quinnipiac poll last week reported findings similar to the new Gallup survey. Both showed Clinton with a 14-point lead and Thompson tied with or ahead of McCain. The USA TODAY Poll, taken last Monday through Thursday, has a margin of error of +/-5 percentage points among the subsample of 393 Republicans or Republican-leaning independents and the 516 Democrats or Democratic-leaning independents. If the Democratic contest came down to Clinton or Obama, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents chose Clinton, 53%-42%.

USA Today, June 17, 2007

Converging primaries affect race - States pushing up dates squeeze out dark horses

Forget about Rudy Giuliani vs. John McCain or Hillary Clinton vs. Barack Obama. The real horse race of the moment is not between White House hopefuls but between states trying to boost their influence by pushing up their primary election dates. The final schedule could drastically reduce the amount of time Americans traditionally have had to compare rival contenders for their party's nominations. It could all but shut out any hopefuls who don't have the star status and deep campaign war chests of the celebrity front-runners. And it could shorten voters' exposure to the candidates and abbreviate debate on major policy issues. "It's not good for the country for the whole nominating process to be over by the end of January or the fifth of February," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a second-time presidential hopeful who is critical of this year's primary schedule. "It's just not healthy."

Shifting Dates - Iowa and New Hampshire, the states that traditionally open the presidential race, are considering making their respective caucuses and primary even earlier to stay ahead of other states. The Iowa and New Hampshire contests are tentatively scheduled for Jan. 14 and Jan. 22. Nothing would stop the states from moving the dates into late 2007. Other states have long envied the time and one-on-one attention that presidential candidates lavish on voters and regional priorities in Iowa and New Hampshire. Presidential candidates, for instance, usually are reluctant to say anything negative about the corn-based ethanol industry out of fear of offending Iowans. This year, several key states are muscling their way toward the front of the line. Florida's primary is Jan. 29. California's and New York's are Feb. 5, which is shaping up as the mother of all Super Tuesdays with more than 20 states having either scheduled their primary or caucuses for the day or thinking about doing so. In the past, the Super Tuesday matchups played out in March. In 2004, 10 states went on Super Tuesday. This time, it could be two dozen or so and a month earlier. Even the date of Arizona's presidential preference election isn't solid. It's now set for Feb. 26, but Gov. Janet Napolitano has until early September to change the date to Feb. 5. Napolitano has hinted that she will make her decision by early July, spokeswoman Jeanine L'Ecuyer said.

'Nothing I Can Do' - The presidential contenders themselves are helpless, hoping the dust will settle and the primary calendar will firm up. "There's nothing I can do about it," McCain said. "Nothing will be done about it this time. But if it gets too crowded up, I think either the party leaders or the Congress is going to step in, in some way, to try to straighten this thing out." To illustrate how times have changed, McCain noted that Dwight Eisenhower, winner of the 1952 election, didn't announce his candidacy for president until June of that year. By that time in this cycle, the nominees will be all but decided. They will be formally anointed at national conventions in late August and early September.

Long odds for second tier - The top-tier candidates in both parties already have raised unprecedented amounts of money. The rapid schedule forces them to do so. They'll need lots of cash in the intense combat expected in the first 40 or so days of next year. At the biggest disadvantage under the new calendar are lesser-known hopefuls, such as Democratic New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson; Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.; former Republican Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee; or Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan. Jimmy Carter is perhaps the classic 20th-century example of a politician rising from obscurity to the White House. In 1976, Carter, a former Georgia governor, parlayed an unexpectedly strong showing in Iowa into a bounce that helped give him the momentum to knock out higher-profile rivals, including the late Rep. Morris Udall, D-Ariz. Even if a dark-horse candidate pulls an early 2008 upset, the fast-coming tidal wave of the Feb. 5 states likely would overwhelm him. "It's really hard to imagine a second-tier candidate or an underfunded candidate emerging from the pack in Iowa and New Hampshire and then raising a sufficient amount of money to wage a credible campaign in New York's media markets or California's media markets or Michigan's media markets," New York-based pollster John Zogby said. The big-name candidates should have the money to recover from early setbacks, providing their defeats are not totally devastating, he said.

Revising Strategies - In some cases, even the celebrity presidential candidates are adjusting or rethinking time-honored political game plans to adapt to the shifting primary landscape. Sen. Obama, D-Ill., this month held a "Walk for Change," essentially a national campaign event that involved supporters in every state. "That is probably a good example of one of the things we are doing to deal with the changing schedule," said Jen Psaki, an Obama spokeswoman.

Rampant Speculation - Nobody knows for sure how 2008's historic compressed primary schedule will unfold for the Republican and Democratic packs. Campaign officials and political analysts are hesitant to make predictions, but the emerging consensus is that the compressed schedule will only multiply the importance of traditional early states.

By Dan Nowicki, Arizona Republic, June 17, 2007
Saturday, June 16, 2007

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the Black Vote

African-American Voters Are Split on the Democratic Front-Runners - At the House of Masters barbershop in Baltimore, they're talking politics -- presidential politics. Bring up who they are going to vote for in the Democratic primary, and you'll start a spirited debate. "So you're voting for him just because he's black." 'No." "But, but, but you are." "The reason I'm voting for him is because I believe he has good morals." Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton - For these black voters, the choice already boils down to just two -- Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., or Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. "Barack Obama. I mean the brother is worth being in office." "I would go with Hillary, with experience of her husband being in there." The Bill Factor - One of Hillary Clinton's biggest advantages is her husband, former President Bill Clinton. He remains enormously popular among African-Americans. Former Baltimore mayor Kurt Schmoke was a supporter of the former president and believes there is still a strong connection. "I think there is a lot of goodwill for her in the black community because of Bill Clinton," Schmoke said. "And if he weren't involved in the campaign, I am less confident that she would have that strong support." And part of it is that many -- maybe most -- black voters are not flocking to Obama just because he's black. Looking Beyond Race - It's much more complex than that says the activist Rev. Al Sharpton. "You've got to remember, we've had two black secretaries of state," Sharpton said. "We've had black mayors, some of which have been disappointing. We've had blacks in high positions. ... The novelty of just saying, 'I'm black,' going for a big position is not what it was." Loyalty to Gender or Race - And what about African-American women? Will they be torn between loyalty to gender -- or loyalty to race? Angela Burt-Murray, editor in chief of Essence magazine, one of the most-read black women's magazines, believes black women have to think about the same issues all Americans think about -- the war, the economy and health care. Issues, she says, have nothing to do with the color or gender of the commander in chief. "It's going to come down to the issues," she said. "It's such an important race this year. It's not something that you can just: 'I'm going to vote for the black guy,' or 'I'm going to vote for the woman,' and trust they are going to advance my agenda just because they look like me." Schmoke, now a dean at Howard University Law School, also believes there's also something intangible at work -- that some African-Americans just don't believe white America would elect a black man president. "It says, 'Why jump in here and get on this bandwagon when we think that down the road that this country is not going to be ready for this? Shouldn't we look at some other alternatives?'" Schmoke said. Back at the House of Masters, there are conflicted feelings about America's readiness. "It never really entered my mind, having a black president. I never thought it would happen, but it would be an amazing thing to see." "Wouldn't it be nice, and successful probably, if Hillary Clinton ran for president and Barack Obama vice president. If that's not a change!" "It's time for change, but I don't think that America is ready for the black president. It's a marathon, not a sprint to November 2008. They'll have to wait and see if history is made.


ABC News, June 16, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 39%, Obama 25%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Almost two-in-five Democratic Party supporters in the United States would like to have Hillary Rodham Clinton as their presidential candidate, according to a poll by Hart/Newhouse released by the Wall Street Journal and NBC News. 39 per cent of respondents would back the New York senator in a 2008 primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 25 per cent, followed by former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 15 per cent. Support is lower for New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Delaware senator Joe Biden, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, and Connecticut senator Chris Dodd.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 16, 2007

Clinton wants family reunification back in immigration bill

WASHINGTON - Speaking at the National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast yesterday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton hailed the renewed effort to pass comprehensive immigration reform in the Senate and vowed to work for family reunification language in the final bill. "I don't think our country, of all countries, should be furthering family breakup and disunity," Clinton said. "And I hope as we bring this immigration legislation forward, that it does more for families." The proposed legislation would establish a point system for allowing new immigrants, with a preference for education. Immigrant advocacy groups support the effort by Clinton and many other senators to exempt family members of current legal immigrants from future quotas. One amendment that would have done that received a majority vote in the Senate but because of procedural rules requiring a 60-vote supermajority, it did not pass. Clinton responded to critics of the bill who have encouraged opposition by pointing out that one of the Senate's most liberal Democrats, Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, has joined with President Bush in support of the legislation. Although Kennedy and Bush are far apart politically, what's important is when they can agree, Clinton said. "We are poor instruments of God's will and we are searching for the truth often through a glass that is very dark," she said. "And so when we compromise, that is not, or should not, be viewed a weakness."

The Journal News, June 16, 2007
Friday, June 15, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 33%, Obama 22%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton remains the most popular Democratic Party presidential hopeful in the United States, according to a poll by Bloomberg and the Los Angeles Times. 33 per cent of respondents would vote for the New York senator in a 2008 presidential primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 22 per cent, followed by former U.S. vice-president Al Gore with 15 per cent, and former North Carolina senator John Edwards with eight per cent. Support is lower for Delaware senator Joe Biden, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, and Connecticut senator Chris Dodd.


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 15, 2007

'Super-Duper Tuesday' May Be Too Big to Matter

An unprecedented number of states have scheduled early presidential primaries to grab some influence from the traditional first kingmakers, Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. But as the law of unintended consequences would have it, the front-loaded calendar could instead make that opening trio of states -- and roughly a half-million voters in each party -- more decisive than ever. On Feb. 5 -- widely called "Super-Duper Tuesday" -- nearly two dozen states, from New York to California, may hold what approaches a national primary. In 2004, just nine states had voted by then. The crush in 2008 will mean that no contender has the time and money to stump in all the Feb. 5 states with anything near the intensity candidates do in states with January contests. That is why Florida has defied both parties' rules aimed at minimizing front-loading, and moved up its primaries to Jan. 29 from March; Michigan's Democrats might follow. So January's top finishers will have the momentum to carry them into February, and also-rans will likely have too little time to catch up, strategists say. Wonder what keeps the dark horses running? It is the potential for upsets in the early states, where meeting voters is relatively easy and TV ads less expensive. One caveat about momentum: Because many states, notably California, allow voting for weeks before their primary day, some ballots could be cast before the results from Iowa or New Hampshire are known. Even so, says David Plouffe, campaign manager for Democrat Barack Obama, "You can't expect to finish poorly in January and resuscitate in February." Republican consultant Mike Murphy of California, who is uncommitted, says he is often asked what a candidate's California strategy should be. "I say, 'Win New Hampshire and Florida.'" Here's a brief guide to 2008's start: On the Democrats' side, antiwar partisans hold sway; a strain of peace activism has run deep in Iowa's history. While New York Sen. Hillary Clinton leads in national polls, she struggles in Iowa given her 2002 vote to authorize force in Iraq. Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards has apologized for the same vote, and antiwar rhetoric now supplements his original antipoverty theme. He has to win here, Democrats say, having campaigned in Iowa virtually since his 2004 presidential bid. But Mr. Obama, the senator from nearby Illinois, is running as a new voice for change, and opposed the Iraq war from the start. Strategists expect the Iowa results to pare each field to two candidates, maybe three, as the also-rans' support and money dry up. New Hampshire: Its primary is tentatively Jan. 22. It may be set earlier -- even December -- to protect the state's influence. (New Hampshire law requires its primaries to be at least seven days before any "similar" state contest.) If New Hampshire moves up, Iowa and South Carolina might follow. Among Democrats, Mrs. Clinton has an early lead in the state. If she fell short in Iowa, New Hampshire could make her the "Comeback Kid" as it did a struggling Bill Clinton in 1992. Stakes are high for Republican Mr. McCain because expectations are: He beat George W. Bush in 2000 by 19 points here, nearly derailing the Texan, and has retained support. But, significantly, both parties' primaries are open, so independents and people unhappy with their own party can vote in either. In 2000, many such voters went for Mr. McCain, then the fresh-faced maverick promising reform. Now Mr. Obama has that role and hopes independents will vote for him. Nevada: Because next year's Jan. 19 caucuses will be a first for Nevada -- unlike Iowa, where the arcane process is an institution -- party strategists are at pains to know who will turn out and what the impact will be in the nominating process. For Democrats, organized labor is influential here, and Mr. Edwards has worked hardest and longest for union support. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson's Western-state strategy has him doing well here and parlaying that into victories on Feb. 5. But Nevada polls have Mrs. Clinton significantly ahead, and Rory Reid -- son of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada -- runs her state operation. Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, after a recent visit with unionists here, said, "The ones I talked to seem to be all in Hillary-land." South Carolina: Democrats' primary is Jan. 29, Republicans' Feb. 2. North Carolinian Edwards was born here and won the Democrats' 2004 contest; he has to do well. But about half of the state's Democrats are black, and Mrs. Clinton is popular with many black voters. Mr. Obama, considered the first black candidate with a serious shot at the nomination, is competitive as well. Sens. Chris Dodd and Joe Biden are campaigning hard, but uphill given the top three Democrats' advantages. Feb. 5: Several states have yet to cement their plans, but the numerous contests spanning every region will test the breadth of the appeal of the front-runners that emerge from January. Besides Mr. Giuliani and Mrs. Clinton, other candidates have home-state advantages Feb. 5, including Mr. Obama in Illinois. Winning the home state doesn't get a candidate much credit -- though losing is deadly -- but these states come rich with delegates (unlike Mr. Dodd's Connecticut and Mr. Biden's Delaware).

By Jackie Calmes, Wall Street Journal, June 15, 2007

Clinton Speaks Out on Stem Cell Research

Hanover, N.H. - A child with diabetes and a paralyzed 23-year-old joined Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday in urging President Bush to loosen restraints on money for embryonic stem cell research. Clinton addressed the issue just days after the House voted to ease limits on the federally funded research despite President Bush's veto threat. Joining her at Dartmouth College were Alex Walter, 10, of Londonderry, N.H., who has Type 1 diabetes, and Laura Clark of Antrim, N.H., who has been paralyzed since a car crash three years. Walter's father, Steve, said he is a registered Republican but supports Clinton because he is frustrated with the Bush administration's stance on stem cell research. His son has endured 10 to 12 blood tests a day and about 100 insulin injections a month since being diagnosed at age 4. "This is not a religious issue," he said. "It's really about a little boy who's 10 years old, and another 100 million Americans who could benefit from this research." Clark's mother, Kathleen, also a Republican, said her daughter's experience has been life-shattering for the family. But she also made a practical appeal, noting the billions spent on people with chronic spinal cord injuries. Even modest advances through stem cell research - allowing quadriplegics to regain the use of their hands - would lead to a significant savings in health care costs, she said. Clinton said the administration's position was part of its general contempt for science and disregard of evidence in favor of ideology. "Every day that passes, we have families like the Walters and the Clarks waiting and wondering whether their government is really on the side of helping and saving the lives of their loved ones," she said. "Where we are now is, we're going backward. We're not just stalled. We're going backward." Bush says the legislation would compel taxpayers to support "the deliberate destruction of human embryos." Lawmakers lack the votes to overturn a veto. But Clinton emphasized that the bill would permit funding only for research on embryonic stem cells donated from in-vitro fertilization clinics - with the donor's approval - that otherwise would be discarded. "We do take seriously the ethical concerns," she said. "This is not something that has been done in a quick, poorly thought out way. ... I think there is a false difference between the president's position and ours."

By Holly Ramer, Associated Press, June 15, 2007
Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 33%, Obama 21%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton is holding on to the top position among Democratic Party supporters in the United States, according to a poll by Ipsos-Public Affairs released by the Associated Press. 33 per cent of respondents would back the New York senator in a 2008 presidential primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 21 per cent, followed by former U.S. vice-president Al Gore with 20 per cent, and former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 12 per cent. Support is lower for New Mexico governor Bill Richardson and Delaware senator Joe Biden.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 13, 2007

Poll: Clinton Leads Giuliani, McCain, Thompson

A national poll from Quinnipiac University today showed Hillary Clinton leading Rudy Giuliani in a theoretical head-to-head match-up by 45 to 44 percent. Al Gore, who isn't a candidate yet, leads Giuliani 45 to 43 percent, and Barack Obama ties Giuliani at 42 percent. Other numbers from the poll: Clinton leads John McCain 44 to 42 percent, and leads Fred Thompson 46 to 39 percent.

By Azi Paybarah, The Politicker, June 13, 2007

Steven Spielberg lends star power to Clinton campaign

LOS ANGELES (AFP) - Legendary director Steven Spielberg declared his support for Hillary Clinton's 2008 White House campaign Wednesday, in a further sign that Hollywood is increasingly lining up behind the former first lady's bid for the presidency, analysts said. Spielberg, who co-hosted a lavish Beverly Hills fundraiser for Clinton's Democratic rival Barack Obama in February, said he was endorsing Clinton after weighing the candidates and deciding she was the best qualified for the job. "Hillary is a strong leader and is respected the world over. As president, she will bring America back together, rebuild our prestige abroad and ensure our protection here at home," said Spielberg, the Oscar-winning director of "Schindler's List" and a string of blockbusters. Analysts say Hollywood celebrities are increasingly turning to Clinton as she consolidates her position as the Democratic front-runner, and the novelty factor of Obama wears off. Political consultant Noah Mamet compared the early Tinseltown support for Obama to the opening of a Hollywood blockbuster. "People were intrigued by (Obama), didn't know him, and came out to see and hear him for the first time earlier in the year," Mamet told the Los Angeles Times. "He was like a big opening weekend for a film, which has a drop-off the next week." Mamet said Clinton was increasingly viewed as "presidential material" by Hollywood's stars and powerbrokers. "Senator Clinton continues to impress people, and the more times people see her and listen to her, the more they view her as presidential material, which she absolutely is," Mamet said. A bevy of celebrities were on hand last week as Clinton raised an estimated 1.1 million in a day of fund-raising in Los Angeles, according to the Times. A star-studded reception -- co-hosted by Spielberg and television mogul Haim Saban at the home of News Corp president Peter Chernin -- raised 850,000 dollars before a function at director Brett Ratner's house netted 250,000. Celebrities attending the events included actress, Jodie Foster, "Spider-Man" star Tobey Maguire and famed producer Brian Grazer. Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a professor of political science at the University of Southern California, said while Spielberg's endorsement was unlikely to have much effect at the ballot box, it could prove influential in persuading Tinseltown to back Clinton. "I'm not sure the Spielberg endorsement means a lot to the average voter but it sends a message that Obama isn't sweeping Hollywood," she told AFP, adding that support for Clinton could be evidence of nostalgia for her husband's presidency. Jonathan Wilcox, a professor at the University of Southern California's Annenberg School of Communication who teaches a class on celebrity and society, said securing Spielberg's support had significant symbolic value. "Steven Spielberg's endorsement is important to Hillary because it is validation from a supporter who has supported her before," Wilcox told AFP. "If he had defected to an insurgent campaign like Obama's it would have doubled the effect. Not only would Obama have been picking up a famous supporter, he would be taking one away from Hillary."

By Rob Woollard, AFP, June 13, 2007

Meek (Finally) Endorses Clinton

After several days of confusion, Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-Fla) has thrown his support to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) presidential campaign -- providing the New York Senator with another brick in her already solid foundation in the Sunshine State. This morning the Clinton campaign sent out a press release touting Meek's official endorsement. "Senator Hillary Clinton is the Democratic candidates with the perfect blend of leadership, talent and intellect to lead our nation in a new direction," Meek said. Putting the weirdness of the last four days aside, Meek's endorsement is critical to Clinton in the state. He is a member of The Fix's Florida Endorsement Elite thanks to his stewardship of two recent statewide campaigns -- Sen. John Kerry's (D-Mass) 2004 presidential effort in Florida and a class size ballot initiative in 2002. (Watch this space tomorrow morning for the Florida Republican Endorsement Elite.) Meek is also the most prominent young African-American leader in the state and his choice of Clinton over Obama is also a symbolic victory for the New York Senator. (Meek's mother, Carrie, who served in Congress from 1992 to 2002, has donated $1,000 to Obama's campaign.) Meek's endorsement lends further strength to Clinton's campaign in Florida where she (and her campaign staff) have focused considerable attention over the past months. In addition to Meek, Clinton also has the backing of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz - a key player in the massively populated Broward County and another member of The Fix Endorsement Elite. With the Sunshine State presidential primary set for Jan. 29, the Clinton campaign may well see Florida as a firewall in the event she fails to live up to expectations in Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina. As the frontrunner, any slippage by Clinton in that gauntlet of votes could turn Florida into a make or break event for her campaign. At the moment, Clinton has reason to feel good about her chances in the state. A Zogby International poll conducted earlier this month put her in the lead with 36 percent, 20 points ahead of Obama and 25 points clear of former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.). A Quinnipiac survey in the field in late May showed similar results; Clinton ahead with 34 percent followed by Obama at 16 percent, former Vice President Al Gore at 13 percent and Edwards at 11 percent. An Insider Advantage survey showed the race far closer with Clinton at 40 percent and Obama at 35 percent.

By Chris Cillizza, The Washington Post, June 13, 2007

Steven Spielberg endorses Hillary Clinton for President

Film director Steven Spielberg endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for president on Wednesday, saying she is the most qualified candidate among Democratic White House hopefuls. "I've taken the time to familiarize myself with the impressive field of Democratic candidates and am convinced that Hillary Clinton is the most qualified candidate to lead us from her first day in the White House," Spielberg said on Hillaryhub.com. "Hillary is a strong leader and is respected the world over. As president, she will bring America back together, rebuild our prestige abroad and ensure our protection here at home." Spielberg carries weight in the Hollywood crowd that could help Clinton pick up more campaign cash and endorsements. He co-hosted a Hollywood fundraiser for her in March that raised more than $1 million.

By Fox News, June 13, 2007
Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Clinton Owes Lead in Poll To Support From Women

The consistent lead that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York has maintained over Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and others in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination is due largely to one factor: her support from women. In the most recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, Clinton led Obama by a 2 to 1 margin among female voters. Her 15-point lead in the poll is entirely attributable to that margin. Clinton drew support from 51 percent of the women surveyed, compared with 24 percent who said they supported Obama and 11 percent who said they backed former senator John Edwards of North Carolina. Clinton is drawing especially strong support from lower-income, lesser-educated women -- voters her campaign strategists describe as "women with needs." Obama, by contrast, is faring better among highly educated women, who his campaign says are interested in elevating the political discourse. Women appear to be playing an outsized role in shaping it and could tip the scale toward the winner. "Women are a significant proportionate share of the Democratic primary electorate in most of these states, and women are disproportionately in favor of Hillary Clinton," said Mark Mellman, a veteran Democratic pollster who is not affiliated with any presidential campaign. According to the most recent Post-ABC national poll, taken between May 29 and June 1, women 18 to 44 years old are more likely to see Clinton as the most inspiring of the candidates. Clinton drew support from 61 percent of women who had at most a high school degree, compared with 18 percent for Obama. By contrast, female college graduates were more deeply split: 38 percent said they preferred Clinton, and 34 percent backed Obama. (Twelve percent said they supported Edwards.) A large gap also appeared on the question of which candidate seemed the most honest and trustworthy: Clinton was considered most honest by 42 percent of women who had only a high school education, compared with 16 percent for Obama. "She ran the country for eight years, so I feel like she could do it again," said Juanita Anders, 71, a registered Democrat who lives in a rural area near Springfield, Ohio, and participated in the Post-ABC poll. Anders, who is a high school graduate with a bit of college education, said that she would "very much" like to see a female president and that, as a result, she has barely given Obama a second thought. She described her support for Clinton as "definite." Clinton is pursuing multiple tracks in hopes of widening the gender gap. She recently banked endorsements from key women's political organizations, including Emily's List and the National Organization for Women. She has launched a women's finance committee to recruit female -- and, her campaign hopes, first-time -- donors. She held women-specific events -- a breakfast in New York, a club party in Washington -- last week and announced that Ellen Malcolm, the president of Emily's List, will serve as a national co-chairman of her campaign. Another goal for the Clinton team: pulling in women as first-time political donors. At a recent meeting of members of the Clinton finance team, Susie Tompkins Buell, a Clinton fundraiser and a California executive, shared the results of a report by the Women's Campaign Forum, a nonprofit organization with ties to Clinton. The group found that women have accounted for less than a third of individual "hard money" contributions to political candidates but make up a huge untapped source for future donations.

By Anne E Kornblut and Matthew Mosk, The Washington Post, June 12, 2007

Clinton, Giuliani Post Blow-Out Leads in Florida

Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani must be rooting for Florida to win its escalating battle to host the first big-state presidential primary. Both are about 20 percentage points ahead of their closest party rivals in a new Sunshine State poll. Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois trails Clinton with 16 percent of Florida's likely Democratic voters to the New York senator's 36 percent in a Zogby international survey. With such lopsided leads for the frontrunners, the challengers face a hugely expensive and time-consuming task to catch up in the nation's fourth-largest state. All the more reason for Clinton and Giuliani to hope that Florida's Jan. 29 primary will be binding for purposes of choosing nominating delegates - which is in question as national party leaders threaten to deny the state its voting power at the 2008 conventions if Florida does not schedule a later primary.

By Craig Crawford, Congressional Quarterly, June 12, 2007

Poll finds N.J. voters favor Clinton, Giuliani

Hillary Rodham Clinton and Rudolph Giuliani remain the most popular presidential choices among New Jersey voters, according to a poll released Monday. Clinton, a Democratic senator from New York, is the top pick for 2008, with support from nearly one of five registered voters in the state. Giuliani, the former Republican New York mayor, has nearly as many, according to the Fairleigh Dickinson University PublicMind poll. "New Jersey voters of all stripes give Giuliani points for his post-9/11 leadership," said Dan Cassino, an FDU political science professor and a survey analyst for PublicMind. "At this point, he's running close to the top Democrat in the state, Hillary Clinton, and that's a very good sign for his campaign." But in the poll's national sample, Clinton retains a 19 percent segment, while Giuliani slips into third behind Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. Clinton led Obama 39 percent to 19 percent among Democrats nationally who had not yet been asked about Bush and Iraq, but her lead shrunk to 31-20 among Democrats who had been asked about those items. The telephone poll of 602 registered voters in New Jersey was conducted from May 29 through June 3 and has a sampling error margin of plus or minus four percentage points. The national sample of 776 registered voters, called during the same period, has a sampling error margin of plus or minus three percentage points.

Associated Press, June 12, 2007

Clinton Picks up '08 endorsement from neighboring Senator

WASHINGTON - New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton for president on Tuesday, saying she is the one to get the United States out of Iraq. "I am proud to endorse Senator Clinton and bring real change to America," Menendez said in an announcement in Washington, D.C. "As someone who voted against the Iraq war, Senator Clinton is the one to get us out of this war." Menendez also said Clinton laid the path toward embracing universal health care. He spoke in Spanish to add that "it's a time to reform immigration and we need a person in the White House who looks out for our interests." Clinton said she was deeply honored and moved to receive Menendez' endorsement. "Together we are fighting to fix our immigration system. ... We cannot turn our backs on families and we will not give up," she said noting that her campaign manager is Latina. "Every vote is important to me ... Latino support is especially important to me." Menendez noted that both Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama campaigned for him during his senatorial campaign last fall. He said he notified Obama on Monday that he would be endorsing Clinton.

By Jake Gibson, Fox News, June 12, 2007
Monday, June 11, 2007

Menendez to endorse Clinton

NEW YORK - Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton has won the endorsement of New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez, a prominent Hispanic Democrat and leading political voice in the vote-rich state. The endorsement was scheduled to be announced Tuesday in Washington, two Democrats familiar with the situation said. Menendez, a Cuban-American and former member of the House leadership, was appointed in December 2005 to fill the Senate seat of Gov.-elect Jon Corzine. Menendez was re-elected in 2006, defeating Thomas Kean Jr., the son of the former Republican governor, in a hard-fought and expensive race. The Menendez endorsement follows that of another prominent Hispanic Democrat, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. Both California and New Jersey are among several large states hosting primaries Feb. 5.

By By BETH FOUHY, Associated Press, June 11, 2007

Clinton seeks support of minority women

NEW YORK - Anticipating a vigorous competition for black and Hispanic votes, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign has scheduled a meeting Tuesday with some 300 "women of color" to urge them to raise money and spread the word among friends to encourage support for Clinton's candidacy. Organizers of the gathering, scheduled at a Washington hotel, hoped to draw an ethnically diverse group of women from business, politics and the arts. Members of Congress who have already endorsed Clinton were expected to be on hand, including Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas, Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio, and Nydia Velasquez of New York. Mary Wilson, a former member of the Supremes, was also scheduled to attend; poet Maya Angelou was sending a video tribute. The meeting was to be run by Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle and by Ann Lewis, the campaign's director of women's outreach. Uber-strategist Harold Ickes was also expected to attend, while campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe planned to make the fundraising pitch. Clinton was also expected to address the gathering, which was closed to press coverage. With top rival Democrat Barack Obama campaigning to be the first black president, the Clinton team has moved aggressively to shore up support among minority communities, especially women. "It's important at this juncture for us to try and do some serious targeting," said Reta Lewis, a former political director during President's Bill Clinton's first term. "We need to give these women a voice and show our strength." Lewis, who helped organize the event, acknowledged the competition for minority votes with Obama and other Democrats in the field, including New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who hopes to become the first Hispanic president. But for Lewis, the choice was simple. "Democrats have an awesome and very diverse field, but for me the issue was leadership - someone who could take charge from day one," she said.

By By BETH FOUHY, Associated Press, June 11, 2007

Poll: Clinton stronger leader, Obama more likeable

WASHINGTON (CNN) - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton appears to have lengthened her lead among likely New Hampshire primary voters after last week's debate among Democratic presidential candidates, winning points for being strong, even if she's not necessarily the most likeable, a poll said Monday. The CNN/WMUR presidential primary poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire, placed the senator from New York at the front of the pack, supported by 36 percent of likely voters versus 22 percent for Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, her closest rival. Since April, Clinton's support has grown by 9 points - from 27 percent, the poll said. Obama's position has grown by just 2 points - from 20 percent - in April. Most of those increases appear to have come at the expense of Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, whose support tumbled from 21 percent in April to his current 12 percent. Former Vice President Al Gore, who has not said he is running, tied Edwards at 12 percent, up from 11 percent in April. And New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson garnered 10 percent, up from 4 percent in April. The rest of the field included Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, with 4 percent; Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, with 1 percent; and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and former Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska, each of whom garnered less than 0.5 percent. the former first lady fared better when likely voters were asked which candidate is the strongest leader. She led the pack, with 48 percent, followed distantly by Gore and Obama - each with 12 percent - and then Edwards, with 6 percent. Asked which candidate has the best chance of beating the Republican nominee in November's general election, Clinton again came out on top, with 37 percent, more than double the 15 percent garnered by Obama and more than triple the 12 percent who cited Gore or the 10 percent who cited Edwards. The telephone poll of 309 Granite State residents who say they will vote in the primary has a sampling error of plus-or-minus 5.5 points. It was carried out Wednesday through Sunday, after the June 3 debate among Democratic presidential candidates, which was sponsored by CNN, the New Hampshire Union-Leader and WMUR-TV.

CNN Political Ticker, June 11, 2007

2008 Democratic Primary: Clinton 37% Obama 25% Edwards 11%

Once again, the Rasmussen Reports national telephone poll of the Democratic Presidential nominating competition shows New York Senator Hillary Clinton with a solid lead. It's a bit bigger lead this week than last - 12 points instead of eight--but the general dynamic of the race remains unchanged. Clinton is supported by 37% of voters in this week's poll, up three points from last week. She has been within three points of the 35% level in fifteen of the last 16 weekly updates. Illinois Senator Barack Obama is at 25% this week--the fifth time in six weeks he has been at 25% or 26%. Former North Carolina Senator John Edwards slipped a few points to 11%, his lowest total since mid-February. The current survey of 773 Likely Democratic Primary Voters was conducted June 4-7, 2007. The margin of sampling error is +/-4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. The Rasmussen Reports sample includes not only Democrats, but also independents who say they are likely to vote in a Democratic Primary.

Rasmussen Reports, June 11, 2007
Sunday, June 10, 2007

Clinton touts experience at rally

When she announced to her father that she wanted to attend law school, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she was told she'd be on her own. "The National Defense Education Act loaned me the money at 2 percent interest," Clinton said at a Saturday evening Story County Democratic Party rally at the Prairie Moon Winery. "I didn't have to worry about some student loan company ripping me off," the former first lady told an applauding audience as she promised to help make higher education affordable to the middle class. "No more jacked up (interest) rates, no more sweetheart deals with colleges that recommend (certain student loan) companies," she said. Failure to lower higher education costs will drop America further behind as it seeks to compete in a global economy, Clinton added. Clinton, who parlayed her law degree into a spot on John Doar's Watergate prosecuting team, married the future governor of Arkansas and spent eight years with husband Bill Clinton in the White House before her election to the Senate, told county Democrats that she offers experienced leadership.
Her positions:
A) Universal health care - "I know how hard that is," Clinton said, recalling the buffeting she took when she tried to implement a plan in 1992. She said that the system needs to be changed so that it will emphasize and pay for preventive care. Lower health care costs have economic consequences, too. Clinton said she'd started her day in Detroit, where she was told that the beleaguered Ford Motor Company is moving some jobs to Canada because health care costs less there.
B) Global warming - "Germany is getting a lot of energy from solar power, and the last time I looked, they didn't have a warm climate," said Clinton, saying that she would finance alternative energy sources by cutting oil company subsidies. In a post-speech Q&A, she said that she has cosponsored a bill with Sen. John Kerry "that would make the federal government an example for green buildings." The country burns one-third of its fossil fuels on buildings, and making them more efficient would save money and slow global warming, she added.
C) Ending U.S. involvement in the Iraq war - U.S. soldiers "were asked to get rid of Saddam Hussein, and they did," said Clinton. "They were asked to find weapons of mass destruction, and they looked but didn't find any. They were asked to stabilize the country's elections, to give Iraq a chance for a government that would lead it into the future, and they did." The Iraqis not only haven't produced a stable government, but the country is involved in a sectarian civil war, and "it's not in our interest to be there any longer," she added.


By Bob Zientara, The Ames Tribune, June 10, 2007
Saturday, June 9, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 36%, Obama 23%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton remains the most popular presidential hopeful for Democratic Party supporters in the United States, according to a poll by Opinion Dynamics released by Fox News. 36 per cent of respondents would vote for the New York senator in a 2008 primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 23 per cent, followed by former U.S. vice-president Al Gore with 14 per cent, and former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 12 per cent. Support is lower for Delaware senator Joe Biden, former Alaska senator Mike Gravel, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, and New Mexico governor Bill Richardson.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 9, 2007

Clinton: U.S. must boost manufacturing

Detroit - Hillary Rodham Clinton told union members and their families Saturday that the country must spend more on manufacturing. "If we don't have a strong manufacturing base in our economy, it won't be long until we don't have a strong economy," the Democratic presidential candidate said. She also cited education, said she wanted to work for universal health care and would bring troops home from Iraq. Clinton said revitalizing the beleaguered manufacturing industry is critical, given fierce global competition and growing health care and retirement costs. "We borrow money every day from other countries like China," Clinton said. She pledged a "smarter" and "tougher" trade stance with countries such as South Korea, which she said keeps U.S.-made automobiles out and further harms American manufacturers. Michigan AFL-CIO President Mark Gaffney said Clinton delivered a strong message. "I think she set herself up as a very credible labor candidate," he said. "She showed she understands our issues, as well as agrees with our issues." Gaffney said Clinton's emphasis on affordable universal health care was appropriate, particularly for a union-friendly audience whose employment is often tied to their company's ability to pay for medical benefits. "I was very impressed," said Detroit resident Geraldine Chatman, 70, a retired member of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union. She said she liked what Clinton had to say about health care. "I liked everything she said. ... I just question how she's going to get it all done. It was very ambitious.”

By David Aguilar, Associated Press, June 9, 2007

Clinton offers Detroit automakers health care aid

DETROIT (Reuters) - U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday offered a double-barreled campaign message for the struggling U.S. auto industry: accept tougher fuel economy standards in exchange for federal help with the costly burden of retiree health care. Speaking at a union hall, Clinton also pledged new U.S. government investment in technologies that promise sharp gains in engine efficiency, such as lithium-ion batteries, an area where Japanese suppliers lead the pack. "I know we have to do more to support the American auto industry and to support the American auto worker," she said. Clinton's speech before a loud and supportive crowd of several hundred mostly AFL-CIO members marked a contrast in tone on the ailing U.S. auto industry from Sen. Barack Obama, Clinton's leading challenger for the Democratic nomination. Obama said in a Detroit appearance last month that the U.S. automakers had not moved fast enough to answer the rising demand for more fuel efficient cars, remarks that rankled both Michigan politicians and industry leaders. In what she called a "win-win" policy prescription for Detroit, Clinton advocated reducing average fuel consumption and shoring up the payroll of an industry that has lost over 150,000 jobs in the past three years. She repeated her backing for stricter U.S. fuel economy standards in pending legislation aimed at the heart of the still truck-heavy lineup offered by Detroit automakers. General Motors Corp, Ford Motor Co and Chrysler Group have lobbied to slow the proposed increases in fuel economy standards. The U.S. Senate is expected to take up a bill that would require raising average fleet fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon by 2020, up from about 25 miles per gallon currently. The bill would also mandate 4 percent annual increases in corporate average fuel economy, or CAFE standards, after that. Detroit automakers have countered that the proposal would cost jobs and force them to build smaller vehicles that American drivers have been unwilling to buy. Clinton said the U.S. automakers would have to accept the changes, but said in exchange the government could also help offset the retiree health care costs seen as the ailing industry's single biggest liability. Taken together, the automakers carry about $91 billion in unfunded retiree health care and life insurance claims and spend some $12 billion on health care each year. Clinton said negotiating health care should not be the UAW's responsibility, saying she favored steps that would "lift some legacy costs from the auto industry."

By Kevin Krolicki, Reuters, June 9, 2007

Hillary Clinton slams proposed U.S.-Korea trade pact

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton , the Democratic front-runner in the presidential race, said on Saturday she would oppose ratification of a free trade pact with South Korea because it would harm the U.S. auto industry, among other things. "While I value the strong relationship the United States enjoys with South Korea, I believe that this agreement is inherently unfair," Clinton said at an event hosted by the AFL-CIO labor confederation in Detroit, home of the U.S. car industry. "It will hurt the U.S. auto industry, increase our trade deficit, cost us good middle-class jobs and make America less competitive." The deal with South Korea, due to be signed on June 30, would lower barriers in areas ranging from agriculture and manufacturing to financial services and telecommunications. Lawmakers from states with auto interests have argued the pact would give South Korea unimpeded access to the U.S. auto market without going far enough to ensure Seoul dismantles barriers to its auto market. Last year, South Korea exported 700,000 cars to the United States while U.S. carmakers sold 6,000 in South Korea, Clinton said, attributing more than 80 percent of a $13 billion U.S. trade deficit with South Korea to such lopsided figures. The two countries released a nearly completed text of their draft pact in late May. The trade deal would be the biggest for the United States since the North American Free Trade Agreement signed in December 1992. Clinton said in a statement the deal did not go far enough to scrap "the multitude of informal barriers that severely restrict the sale of American vehicles." "Unless those barriers fall, American carmakers will face increased competition at home and won't get greater access to South Korea's market," she said. Opinion polls show Clinton, who was first lady when her husband Bill was president, in the lead among Democrats hoping to win their party's nomination to run for the presidency.

By Jim Wolf, Reuters, June 9, 2007

Clinton Questions Emphasis on Testing

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton criticized the No Child Left Behind education program Saturday, saying its emphasis on testing puts American students in danger of losing their creative edge. "I think that we are in danger of narrowing the curriculum and leaving children behind," Clinton said Saturday. "That's the very opposite of what they said would happen." Clinton voted for No Child Left Behind, President Bush's signature education policy, in 2001, but has since been a sharp critic. She said the program's emphasis on testing is diluting resources from other valuable areas of education. That will be a problem for the country going forward, she said. "Part of the reason America was always in the forefront of the World Economy is that we're the innovators ... it's because we have creative learners, we have people who learned to get around obstacles, they didn't go in a straight line." Clinton spoke at a campaign event in Indianola, where she helped raise money for state lawmaker Sen. Staci Appel. At the end of the event Appel, who is serving her first term in the Legislature, said she was endorsing Clinton's presidential bid. One woman, a college student studying music, asked Clinton what she would do to ensure there was room for music education in public schools. Clinton said she was a big supporter of music and other creative venues in school. "Anyone who's ever heard me sing, knows, I can't sing," she said. "It's a shame. I always sound great to my ears. ... But I love music, and I cherish music, and I think back to my own years at school when the music teachers would come into our classroom." Clinton said music and art can help unlock hidden potential in some students. "Music and art, and exposure to different set of cultural experiences can ignite such a creative passion and imagination in some people," she said. "I worry that No Child Left Behind with its emphasis on tests ... is going to weed so many kids out."

By Henry C. Jackson, Associated Press, June 9, 2007

Clinton stressed education credentials at Indianola event

INDIANOLA -- Democratic presidential hopeful U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, at an education-themed fundraising appearance for a state senator on Saturday, praised a new Iowa law that allows every 4-year-old the chance to go to preschool as a good investment. "(The Iowa Legislature) is setting an example a lot of us our following," the Democratic presidential candidate told about 200 people at a fundraising appearance for state Sen. Staci Appel, D-Ackworth. "We know that is a good investment for Iowa and America. They start out behind and it is hard for them to catch up." Clinton backed up Appel's point that some children enter kindergarten not knowing colors, their address and sometimes their last names. Appel served as the floor leader in the Iowa Senate for the bill that passed the Legislature and was signed in May by Democratic Gov. Chet Culver. Clinton was proposing a similar bill in the U.S. Senate at the same time. Clinton used the event to stress her education credentials, saying her mother passed on a deep belief in the value of a good education and the arts. "I also had a village - they did keep an eye on us and made us feel important," Clinton said, calling for a fix to the `No Child Left Behind' law. "No Child Left Behind will leave many kids out. I think we are narrowing the curriculum and leaving people behind. Field trips are being cut out. Physical education is being cut out." Creating universal health care and establishing a renewable fuels program is also important, and priorities, Clinton told the crowd. "We need to take the subsidies from the oil companies when price of gas is so high," the senator said to healthy applause. "There is a lot we can do with renewable fuels, global warming and create jobs." Jan Walters of Indianola is an undecided Iowan, but likes Clinton's message. "One thing that intrigues me about her is her experience in the White House... (knowing) the ropes of politics," Walters said. Clinton's experience also resonates well with Madison County resident Esther Smith. "I think she is wonderful," Smith said. "She wouldn't have to get into office and get used to it. She knows what has to be done."

By Chris Dorsey, Iowa Politics, June 9, 2007
Friday, June 8, 2007

Clinton, Schumer say DOE ignoring power line foes

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer on Friday accused the U.S Department of Energy of turning a deaf ear to critics of a proposed 200-mile stretch of 150-foot-tall electrical towers that would cut through scenic regions of upstate New York. The two New York Democrats expressed concern over the location of a planned DOE meeting next week for public comment on implications of a new law that allows private property to be taken by federal eminent domain for construction of electrical power lines. The June 12 meeting will be held in Rochester, an upstate New York city that is about 130 miles from the area of the proposed power line. The line would be erected between Utica and the town of New Windsor in Orange County by a private company called New York Regional Interconnection (NYRI). Much of the 1200-megawatt line would go up along unspoiled slopes of the Catskill Mountains and parts of the Upper Delaware River corridor that are protected under a federal wild and scenic river designation. Other parts would run through settled communities, including back yards. "Placing this hearing over 100 miles away, in Rochester, rather than in the area that would be impacted by NYRI's proposed route is bizarre and unfair," Schumer, who called upon the DOE to schedule a meeting along the proposed route, said in a statement released to Reuters. Clinton said the DOE, in seeking comment about the corridors, was duty bound to hold hearings in counties within the Mid-Atlantic corridor where NYRI aims to build its power line. "Communities up and down the proposed NYRI route are justifiably outraged that the Department of Energy has remained so unwilling to hear their concerns," Clinton said in a statement released to Reuters. "This smacks of arrogance on the part of the Department and is extremely disappointing." "We need to know that the DOE hears the full strength of the opposition to this proposal," said Clinton. She said she had made her opposition to the NYRI plan "very clear and will continue to work with all the communities concerned to fight it."

By Ransdell Pierson, Reuters, June 8, 2007

CLINTON, ROMNEY LEAD IN NH POLL

In the the aftermath of this week's presidential debates in New Hampshire, Clinton and Romney come out on top in a new Mason-Dixon poll of likely primary voters there. Among likely Democratic primary voters, Clinton leads Obama, 26%-21%, with Edwards at 18%, Richardson at 9%, and Biden at 6%; no other Democratic presidential contender gets more than 1%. Among likely GOP primary voters, Romney leads McCain, 27%-16%, followed by Giuliani at 15%, Fred Thompson at 12%, and Huckabee at 5%. The Mason-Dixon poll -- which was given exclusively to NBC and MSNBC -- was taken June 4-7, 2007, and the Dem field has a margin of error of +/- 4.9%, and the GOP field has a margin of error of +/- 5.3%.

By Mark Murray, NBC, June 8, 2007

Hillary Clinton enjoys renewed Hollywood clout

An early infatuation with Obama's candidacy appears to be fading among the ex-first lady's Hollywood supporters. It's starting to look like Hollywood's infatuation with Sen. Barack Obama was just a flirtation before it settles down with its longtime girlfriend, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. Most of Hollywood may lean Democratic, but the direction of that inclination can be as fickle as the Santa Anas. During the last presidential election, some people changed their mind five times before they settled on Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.). And, as it is with everything in this world of glitz, candidates - like celebrities - benefit from buzz. So here's the buzz these days: Clinton's presidential bid has begun to regain momentum over Obama's in the entertainment industry. In fact, it's become so strong that Steven Spielberg, once considered a solid supporter of Illinois Democrat Obama, is now believed to be leaning in favor of Clinton, according to longtime industry politicos. (Spielberg's political spokesman, Andy Spahn, was coy this week when asked about Spielberg's political thinking. "We have nothing to announce," Spahn said, but stay tuned.) But behind the scenes, the signs are pretty clear. Last week, Clinton cruised through town raising a cool $1.1 million in one day. At a celebrity-studded reception at News Corp. President Peter Chernin's house - an event co-hosted by Spielberg and television financier Haim Saban - Clinton brought in $850,000. (Chernin's boss, Rupert Murdoch, currently bidding to take over the Wall Street Journal, is a political conservative who sometimes gives to Democratic candidates.) Even super-agent Ari Emanuel, who is one of Obama's top industry supporters, wrote a check to Clinton. Later, the junior senator from New York went to director Brett Ratner's house, where she raised $250,000 at the event held in Ratner's downstairs disco. A variety of young Hollywood hipsters ponied up, including will.i.am, Eric Dane, Rebecca Gayheart, Alex Avant and Quincy Jones (the latter not exactly young but forever hip). The former first lady wowed crowds last week, said longtime Hollywood political consultant Donna Bojarsky. "There was a good turnout of Hollywood folks at Chernin's - J.J. Abrams, Jodie Foster, Tobey Maguire, Brian Grazer - and they all seemed pleased and receptive," said Bojarsky, who has not yet announced whom she is supporting in the race. "She did a real tour-de-force analysis of the world." Like Democrats across the country, Hollywood activists are still wondering whether Obama has the experience to tackle the country's problems in these dangerously troubled times. "Sen. Clinton continues to impress people, and the more times people see her and listen to her, the more they view her as presidential material, which she absolutely is," said consultant Noah Mamet, who represents Clinton loyalist Casey Wasserman. "She helps herself immensely every time she visits L.A." Mamet thinks the industry's flirtation with Obama was just a passing fancy, a bit of what-if casting, as in, what if we could get Brad Pitt to play Albert Schweitzer? "People were intrigued by [Obama], didn't know him, and came out to see and hear him for the first time earlier in the year," Mamet said. "He was like a big opening weekend for a film, which has a drop-off the next week.

By Tina Daunt, Los Angeles Times, June 8, 2007
Thursday, June 7, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary at 34%, Obama 26%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton is holding on to the top spot in the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in the United States, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 34 per cent of respondents would back the New York senator in a 2008 primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 26 per cent, followed by former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 15 per cent. Yesterday, Rodham Clinton discussed her religious beliefs, saying, "I am very grateful that I had a grounding in faith that gave me the courage and the strength to do what I thought was right, regardless of what the world thought. (...) I take my faith very seriously and very personally. And I come from a tradition that is perhaps a little too suspicious of people who wear their faith on their sleeves."

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 7, 2007

FOX NEWS POLL: CLINTON, GIULIANI SEEN AS TOP WHITE HOUSE CANDIDATES

NEW YORK - More voters see Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani as "very likely" to win the presidency, if nominated by their respective parties, than think the same of other top tier candidates, according to a new FOX News poll. Opinion Dynamics Corp. conducted the national telephone poll of 900 registered voters for FOX News from June 5 to June 6. The poll has a 3-point error margin. Compared to the other front-runners - Democrat and Republican - Hillary Clinton is seen by more voters as "very likely" to win the 2008 election. With the "if nominated" caveat, 35 percent of voters think it is very likely Clinton could win the presidency, while 29 percent think it is very likely Giuliani could be elected and 23 percent think the same of Obama. The candidates are on more equal footing when looking at how their own party faithful feels about them. Among Democrats, 85 percent think Clinton is likeable and 83 percent Obama. For Republicans, 86 percent say Giuliani is likeable and 76 percent McCain. In the Democratic contest, 36 percent support Clinton (down just 1 point from last month), and 23 percent back Obama (up 3 percentage points). In the next tier there is former Vice President Al Gore at 14 percent and Edwards at 12 percent; no other candidates receive double-digit support. If the general election were held today, Giuliani would edge out both of the top Democrats -besting Clinton by 3 points (45 percent to 42 percent) and Obama by 5 points (46 percent to 41 percent). Clinton has a clear advantage over lesser-known Republicans. For example, Clinton tops both Romney (46 percent to 36 percent) and Fred Thompson (48 percent to 38 percent) by 10 points. Between Clinton and McCain, it's a tie: 43 percent each. If Clinton won the presidency, twice as many voters think her victory would be seen as electing the first woman to the White House (52 percent) rather than as another term for the Clintons (29 percent). Most Democrats (71 percent) would see it as the first woman president while a plurality of Republicans (45 percent) would see it as another Clinton term.

By Dana Blanton, Fox News, June 7, 2007

Pa. Democrats favor Clinton for 2008

HARRISBURG -- Hillary Clinton has a commanding lead among Pennsylvania Democrats, but there is no clear leader among GOP presidential candidates in the state, according to a poll released Wednesday. The Keystone Poll conducted for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review shows Clinton, a New York senator, with a 40 to 21 percent lead over former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards. Illinois Sen. Barack Obama trailed with 18 percent. On the Republican side, Arizona Sen. John McCain and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani were tied at 29 percent each, with former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney a distant third at 12 percent. The poll didn't include Fred Thompson, former Tennessee senator, who is considering an entry into the GOP presidential race. "It's still very fluid" in the Republican contest, said G. Terry Madonna, the poll's director at Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster County. Voters will elect a president in 2008. Clinton has a solid lead because of her husband Bill Clinton's popularity and because she has run a good race so far, Madonna said. The poll surveyed 567 Pennsylvanians between May 29 and June 4. The poll's margin of error was plus or minus 4.1 percent. The margin of error was higher, 6.8 percent, in party breakdowns in the presidential race. The survey was conducted for the Trib, Philadelphia Daily News, Harrisburg Patriot-News, WGAL in Lancaster and WTAE in Pittsburgh.

By Brad Burnsted, Pittsburg-Tribune Review, June 7, 2007
Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Sen. Whitehouse backs Clinton

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) became the fourth senator to endorse Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) for the presidency Wednesday, citing her leadership skills as qualifying her for the job. "I'm proud to endorse Senator Hillary Clinton to be our next president," Whitehouse said in a statement. "Her smart, tough, experienced leadership will be critically important as we work to bring our troops home from Iraq, reform our healthcare system to cover more American families, and solve the energy challenges of the 21st century." Clinton's camp announced that Whitehouse would join the campaign team as a co-chairman for her Rhode Island campaign. Former president Bill Clinton had appointed Whitehouse as U.S. attorney, a post he held until 1998, when he became the state's attorney general. Whitehouse was elected to the Senate last November. Whitehouse joins Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) in supporting Clinton. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has given funds to Clinton's campaign through her political action committee, which many observers view as a tacit endorsement.

By Kara Oppenheim, The Hill, June 6, 2007

Poll: Clinton wins N.H. support

Coming off the first debate of the New Hampshire primary season, Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York has seen her support grow in the state, according to a recently released statewide poll. In the Franklin Pierce College/WBZ poll of 424 likely Democratic presidential primary voters, Clinton received 38 percent of the vote while Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois ran second with 16 percent. Clinton's margin of victory marked a jump of 15 points over a March poll that showed Clinton holding 32 percent of the vote to Obama's 25 percent. The poll has a 4.8 percent margin of error. But in one national poll, the USA Today/Gallup Poll released Tuesday, Clinton and Obama were in a dead heat - the only national poll not showing Clinton with a lead. Nick Clemons, Clinton's state campaign director, downplayed the results of the polls this early in the election cycle, but he said the "snapshot" of her most recent performance is a reflection of Clinton's extensive effort in the state and her ability to articulate her messages and connect with voters. "It's very much a vote of confidence in her overall leadership," said Clemons about Clinton, who has made eight campaign trips to the state this year. The Franklin Pierce/WBZ poll, conducted the day after the Democrats' Sunday night debate in Manchester, also showed that voters believe Clinton won the debate by according to 45 percent of those polled, while 8 percent said Obama won the debate. Pollster Kelly Myers, a senior fellow at Franklin Pierce College, said the results of the poll showed that Clinton's "support was already growing throughout the state. Her (debate) performance was a validation of what voters were already expecting." A local voter who recently decided to support Clinton believes she will be a strong candidate who will "take the Democrats to victory." "My priority is to get a Democrat in the White House," said Stephen Clark of Rye. "... The Republicans want to make this a national security election, and she always projects strength and confidence on all national security issues."

By Michael McCord, Seacoastonline, June 6, 2007

Democrats 2008: Hillary 35%, Obama 23%

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Hillary Rodham Clinton remains the top contender in the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in the United States, according to a poll by TNS released by the Washington Post and ABC News. 35 per cent of respondents would support the New York senator in a 2008 primary. Illinois senator Barack Obama is second with 23 per cent, followed by former U.S. vice-president Al Gore with 17 per cent, and former North Carolina senator John Edwards with eight per cent. Support is lower for Delaware senator Joe Biden, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Connecticut senator Chris Dodd, and Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 6, 2007
Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Edwards, Clinton and Obama Describe Journeys of Faith

WASHINGTON, June 4 -One presidential hopeful described how prayer helped him survive his son's death and his wife's cancer diagnosis. Another spoke about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of faith in forgiving those who treat others unjustly. A third said of her husband's infidelity, "I'm not sure I would have gotten through it without my faith." Intimate discussions of politics and religion have long been the province of Republican candidates for public office. But on Monday night, the three leading Democratic presidential hopefuls - opened up at an unusual televised forum about their faiths, the role of prayer in their public and private lives and the ways that religion informs their views on policy and government. Each is aiming to make historic inroads among evangelical Christians and other committed churchgoers who have up to now been most linked with the Republican base. The candidates appeared eager not just to discuss their policies but also to discuss their personal faith journeys as they spoke. The participants sought to walk a fine line between appealing to religious voters, while not turning off secular voters, who represent a crucial constituency for them. Mrs. Clinton, who appeared comfortable chatting on stage with the CNN interviewer, Soledad O'Brien, and later roaming the stage while addressing the audience, drew the most rounds of applause. There were moments on stage that had an almost confessional quality for her. Ms. O'Brien noted that Mrs. Clinton had shared relatively little about her faith in public but then carefully broached what has largely been the one issue that has been largely off limits in Mrs. Clinton's campaign, her husband's infidelity, asking whether her faith helped her deal with it. "I'm not sure I would have gotten through it without my faith," Mrs. Clinton said. Mrs. Clinton said she took her faith "very seriously and very personally" but went on to say she came from a faith tradition, Methodism, that is "perhaps a little too suspicious of people who wear their faiths on their sleeves." She admitted that talking about her faith in public "doesn't come naturally to me," saying she often flashed back to "the Pharisees and all of the Sunday school lessons and readings I had as a child." She expressed gratitude for close friends and others who she said were praying for her, describing them as "prayer warriors" who "sustained me through a very difficult time." "I am very grateful I had a grounding in faith that gave me the courage and the strength to do what I thought was right, regardless of what the world thought," she said, drawing a rousing round of appreciative applause. When Ms. O'Brien asked what she asked God for in her prayers, Mrs. Clinton drew laughter from the audience when she said, "Sometimes, I say, 'Oh Lord, why can't you help me lose weight.' "

By Patrick Healy and Michael Luo, New York Times, June 5, 2007
Monday, June 4, 2007

Clinton: Faith got me past marital woes

WASHINGTON - In a rare public discussion of her husband's infidelity, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that she probably could not have gotten through her marital troubles without relying on her faith in God. Clinton stood by her actions in the aftermath of former President Clinton's admission that he had an affair, including presumably her decision to stay in the marriage. I am very grateful that I had a grounding in faith that gave me the courage and the strength to do what I thought was right, regardless of what the world thought," Clinton said during a forum where the three leading Democratic presidential candidates talked about faith and values. "I'm not sure I would have gotten through it without my faith," she said in response to a question about how she dealt with the infidelity. Clinton said she's "been tested in ways that are both publicly known and those that are not so well known or not known at all." She said it's those times when her personal faith and the prayers of others sustain her. "At those moments in time when you are tested, it is absolutely essential that you be grounded in your faith," she said. Clinton acknowledged that talking about her religious beliefs doesn't come naturally to her. "I take my faith very seriously and very personally," she said. "And I come from a tradition that is perhaps a little too suspicious of people who wear their faith on their sleeves."

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer, June 4, 2007

Why Hillary Clinton was the winner of the Democratic debate

Last night on CNN, I said that Hillary Clinton was the winner of the Democratic debate. This morning, during a Creative Coalition-sponsored panel at the Radisson Hotel in New Hampshire, Lawrence O'Donnell, who was moderating, asked me if, after a good night's sleep, I wanted to "revise and extend" my remarks. No, I don't want to revise my remarks. I want to extend them. Hillary Clinton won because she arrived at the debate as the front-runner - with a widening lead - in national polls -- and left the debate with her position solidified. Her success was due in part to what she did during the debate, and in part to what Barack Obama failed to do. She came across as more comfortable in her own skin, and more natural and less programmed than in the past. And she exhibited an effortless charm that those close to her often rave about but that the public rarely sees. She even scored two of the biggest laughs of the night with her zinger about Dick Cheney's diplomatic skills, and her use of Barry Goldwater's "shoot straight" line about gays in the military. She was particularly effective in achieving her campaign's foremost objective: blurring the differences between her and her opponents on Iraq. "The differences among us are minor," she said of her fellow candidates. "The differences between us and the Republicans are major. And I don't want anybody in America to be confused." This successful blurring of differences was made possible by Obama's failure to challenge Clinton's statements about the war -- something that he could have easily done since the contradictions in her positions were front and center in the news yesterday, in a cover story in the New York Times Magazine. He could have raised substantive points, undermining her claims without in any way tarnishing his "new kind of politics" patina. For instance, he could have questioned Hillary's claim that when she voted to authorize the war, she was actually voting to strengthen Bush's hand so he could pursue diplomacy, by pointing out that she had voted against an amendment put forth by Carl Levin that would have required Bush to exhaust all diplomatic approaches before invading Iraq. And he could have pressed the question of why Clinton had voted to authorize the war without reading the full National Intelligence Estimate. Doing so would have been no different in tone than his counterpunch comment that John Edwards had been "four and a half years late on leadership" on Iraq -- which was Obama's debate high point. Hillary Clinton's strategy is to rise above the Democratic fray and keep the focus on George Bush. And that's a good strategy for a front-runner. Barack Obama's strategy also appears to be rising above the fray. But that is no way to unseat a front-runner. Iraq is Hillary's Achilles heel. But it will become less and less so if Obama keeps letting her off the hook on the war and on national security. The point isn't just how Clinton voted in 2002, but how she is thinking in 2007. If she really believes that we are safer now than we were before Bush invaded Iraq, she is seriously misguided -- and is on the wrong side of the national security debate that will undoubtedly be at the heart of the 2008 election.

By Ariana Huffington, The Huffington Post, June 4, 2007

Edwards, Clinton, Obama Skirmish on Iraq, Health Care in Debate

June 4 (Bloomberg) - The three leading Democratic presidential candidates - John Edwards, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama skirmished over the Iraq war and health-care coverage in a debate last night. Clinton, a New York senator who is leading in most polls, said criticism of the war should be directed at Bush and the Republican Party, not the Democrats. "This is George Bush's war - he is responsible for this war,'' she said. "The differences among us are minor. The differences between us and the Republicans are major.'' All the top candidates said they would finance expanded health care, in part by repealing Bush's tax cuts for more affluent Americans. The candidates only differed slightly in identifying who would be considered affluent. Analysts said that most of the candidates did well while stressing that the three leading contenders, Clinton, Obama and Edwards, dominated the forum.
Two Tiers' - It "reinforced the whole idea that there are two tiers of candidates,'' said Dante Scala, a politics professor at St. Anselm College in Manchester. Striking a tough and knowledgeable image, Clinton said she would be firm with Iran on terrorism, while stressing diplomacy over military action. "In my administration, diplomacy - patient, careful diplomacy'' would be a priority, she said. Clinton departed from her usually serious tone to display a flash of humor while discussing the Bush administration's foreign policy. "We've had an administration that doesn't believe in diplomacy,'' she said. "You know, they have every so often Condi Rice go around the world and show up somewhere and make a speech, and occasionally they even send Dick Cheney - and that's hardly diplomatic in my view.'' When asked how they would use Bill Clinton in their administration if elected, the candidates agreed he should be a global ambassador to improve relations. "When I become president, Bill Clinton, my dear husband, will be one of the people who will be sent around the world as a roving ambassador to make it very clear to the rest of the world that we're back to a policy of reaching out and working and trying to make friends," Hillary Clinton said.

By Catherine Dodge and Jeff Bliss, Bloomberg, June 4, 2007

Clinton Keeps Her Lead in New Hampshire Debate

The worst case scenario for Sen. Hillary Clinton in last night's New Hampshire debate would be that she did not win or lose ground against her Democratic presidential rivals. And that means victory for a frontrunner in any political campaign. But Clinton did more than hold her own in the face-off aired by CNN. She won. Due in part to her commanding center placing on the stage among eight contenders, the New York Democrat came across as the boss. Her opponents frequently paid their respects to Clinton and her husband - even when they were fumbling for ways to subtly criticize the former First Lady without sounding too harsh. In two of the most telling moments of the night, Clinton all but took control of the debate as moderator Wolf Blitzer entangled other candidates with hypothetical scenarios about pursuing terrorists. In both cases she interrupted the discussion to defend her foes on the grounds that such speculative questions were out of line, gaining the applause of the studio audience - and admiring glances from the other hopefuls. At those moments you could see that until someone finds a way to change things, Clinton owns this nomination race.

By Craig Crawford, CQ Politics, June 4, 2007

Clinton makes Iraq pullout pledge

Hillary Clinton has solidified her status as favourite for the White House in 2008 with an assured Democratic debate performance in which she vowed to pull troops out of Iraq within 100 days of taking office. Mrs Clinton repeatedly lambasted President George W Bush, sidestepping an attack from the left by John Edwards, who drew a sharp retort from Senator Barack Obama when he accused him of a lack of leadership. Mrs Clinton, buoyed by an ABC/Washington Post poll released at the weekend that gave her a 12-point lead over Mr Obama with Mr Edwards in third a further six points behind, successfully rose above the fray, minimising differences between her and the other seven candidates. In an apparent attempt to appeal to centrist voters, she even said that America was safer now than it was on September 11 - an opening for Mr Obama to disagree with her that he declined to take. When Mr Edwards said that Mr Bush's war on terror was a "political slogan, a bumper sticker", the New York senator took issue with him. "I have seen first hand the terrible damage that can be inflicted on our country by a small band of terrorists." "This is George Bush's war," she said. "He is responsible for this war, he started the war, he mismanaged the war, he escalated the war and he refuses to end the war."

By Toby Harnden, The Telegraph, June 4, 2007

White women may be Clinton swing bloc

Support from women is propelling Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) ahead of her Democratic challengers and positioning her as the most likely candidate to win the nomination, according to new polling analyses. In a show of strength against Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), Clinton holds a lead even among minority women of more than 25 percentage points, according to surveys by Zogby International and The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Clinton, the first female presidential candidate with a realistic chance of winning the White House, would need to carry the women's vote decisively in a general election to overcome what surveys consistently have shown as her unpopularity among men. The Clinton campaign said it would give special attention to white married working women, a group Democratic strategists have treated as the pivotal voting bloc in recent elections. "They are a challenge for any Democrat," says Ann Lewis, who heads Clinton's outreach to women. But early indications are that, like Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) and Al Gore before her, Clinton has not made significant inroads with white women, despite her celebrity and the historic nature of her campaign. White women have not favored a Democrat since 1996. Even then, Bill Clinton proved unable to win a majority. Yet in the primary contest, where the New York senator currently splits men and maintains a strong lead among women, Clinton remains formidable. The support of Democratic women so far is serving as a barricade for Clinton, allowing her to retain her front-runner status in the face of a challenge by Obama. This is an especially valuable advantage, since support tied to gender is likely to remain more constant than malleable perceptions like electability and character. Clinton splits men with Obama (32 percent each) among likely Democratic primary voters. Strikingly, the gender gap in Clinton's favor in the Democratic contest crosses racial lines, despite Obama's African-American status, according to the Pew and Zogby research. "Women of color, especially black women, tend to make up their mind early in the process," says Democratic strategist Donna Brazile. Brazile was the first black woman to manage a major party presidential campaign, overseeing Gore's 2000 bid for the presidency. "Here's the problem for Senator Obama: He's not well-known. People tend to think that because he's an African-American that he'll attract African-American support. That's not the way it works," Brazile continues. "The way it works is that African-Americans tend to support those they know, and Hillary Clinton, like Bill Clinton, are known commodities." Clinton also leads Obama by more than 10 percent among white Democratic women, according to both polling groups. Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards runs a distant third nationally among men and women.

By David Paul Kuhn, The Politico, June 4, 2007
Sunday, June 3, 2007

McCain, Rodham Clinton Lead in Iowa

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - John McCain is the most popular 2008 United States presidential hopeful for Republican Party supporters in Iowa, according to a poll by American Research Group. 25 per cent of likely GOP caucus voters in the Hawkeye State would back the Arizona senator in 2008. In the sample of Democratic Party supporters, New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is first with 31 per cent, followed by former North Carolina senator John Edwards with 25 per cent, and Illinois senator Barack Obama with 11 per cent. Support is lower for New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, Delaware senator Joe Biden, Connecticut senator Chris Dodd, retired general Wesley Clark, and former Alaska senator Mike Gravel. Since 1976, the Iowa caucus has kicked off the process of finding presidential nominees for the two major political parties in the United States. The caucus differs from a presidential primary because the casting of ballots in favour of a particular candidate is preceded by a "gathering of neighbours" where specific platform issues are discussed.

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research, June 3, 2007

Clinton, Giuliani Maintain Leads, But GOP Shows Signs of Shifting

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York holds a solid lead over her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, while the contest for the Republican nomination appears even more unsettled than it did when it began five months ago, according to a new Wasington Post-ABC News poll. Clinton's lead remains steady over her two principal challengers, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former senator John Edwards of North Carolina, and the poll contains troubling news for both. Obama's support has softened noticeably, highlighting the challenge he faces in turning high interest in his candidacy into votes. Edwards, meanwhile, has lost ground nationally over the past few months. Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani remain the leader in the GOP race, but the poll suggests that the surge in support he received after declaring his candidacy has stalled and that his backing of abortion rights and gay rights has caused more Republicans to turn away from him. Sen. John McCain of Arizona runs second in the GOP race, but the poll results raise questions about his candidacy. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, who has spent millions on television ads already this year, has in some ways become an attractive alternative over the past few months, and former senator Fred D. Thompson of Tennessee shows the potential to quickly make the GOP contest a four-way battle. The poll provides a revealing snapshot of the 2008 presidential race as the candidates gather this week for a pair of debates in New Hampshire, which will hold the first primary next year. A first-blush look at the Post-ABC News poll suggests no dramatic change in the two races, despite five months of intensive campaigning on both sides. But the findings underscore potential volatility on both sides as well as the obstacles facing many of the serious contenders. In the Republican race, Giuliani leads the field with 34 percent, followed by McCain at 20 percent, Thompson at 13 percent and Romney at 10 percent. No other Republican receives more than 2 percent. Those results showed no significant change since the last poll in April. In the Democratic race, Clinton led with 42 percent, with Obama second at 27 percent and Edwards third at 11 percent. Clinton and Obama's numbers were essentially unchanged from an April poll, but Edwards dropped six percentage points. Edwards has pinned his hopes for the nomination on winning the Iowa caucuses and using that momentum in subsequent contests. The new poll underscores how much his candidacy hinges on that strategy. Clinton's front-runner status is built on a huge lead over her rivals among women. She and Obama run equally among men, but she has a 2-1 advantage over him among women. She also runs much better among hard-core Democrats, rather than Democratic-leaning independents, where she and Obama are neck and neck. Clinton was seen as the strongest leader of the three and dominated Obama and Edwards on the question of who was best experienced to be president. Sixty-six percent of Democrats cited her as best experienced, compared with 19 percent who said Edwards and just 9 percent who said Obama, who has served only 2 1/2 years in the Senate. Of the three candidates, Clinton was seen as the most electable in a general election and as the closest to poll respondents on the issues. In February, 60 percent of those who said they backed Obama said they did so strongly, but in the new poll, that had fallen to 43 percent. A majority of his backers now say they only support him "somewhat." "Nobody's gone from 0 to 60 in American politics faster than Barack Obama," Democratic pollster Mark Mellman said. "He is hugely talented, but he needs a good second act." The entry of former vice president Al Gore would shake up the race, but it would not threaten Clinton's double-digit lead. With Gore in the race, Clinton would have 35 percent, Obama 23 percent, Gore 17 percent and Edwards 8 percent. The poll was conducted by telephone May 29 to June 1 among a random sample of 1,205 adults. Results from the full poll have a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. Sampling error margins are higher for subgroups.

By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen, Washington Post, June 3, 2007

Obama, Clinton Respond to Edwards

After former Sen. John Edwards named names - Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama to be exact - when it came to the differences between the Big 3 on the war in Iraq, the two lawmakers struck back. "There is a difference between leading and following," said Edwards, adding that neither Clinton nor Obama spoke out before their votes against the Iraq war funding bill. Obama pounced, agreeing that it is "important to lead" before telling Edwards: "You are about four-and-half-years late on leadership on this issue" -- a reference to Edwards's vote for the 2002 use of force resolution. Clinton's response was more subtly jabbing. "This is George Bush's war," she said, casting the Democrats on stage as unified against the war. She then contrasted those who are speaking from outside the political process to those "working on the inside" to effect change.

By Chris Cilliza, Washington Post, June 3, 2007
© 2007 www.hillaryclintonclub.com All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Disclaimer
Hillary Clinton Club